Abstract
Because ancestral women could have obtained genetic benefits through extra-pair sex only near ovulation, but paid costs of extra-pair sex throughout the cycle, one might expect selection to have shaped female interest in partners, other than primary partners, to be greater near ovulation than during the luteal phase. Because men would have paid heavier costs if their partners had extra-pair sex near ovulation, one might also expect selection to have shaped males' efforts to track their primary partners' whereabouts to be increased near ovulation, relative to the luteal phase. Women filled out questionnaires about their sexual interests and their partners' mate-retention tactics twice: once within 5 days before a lutenizing hormone surge and once during the luteal phase. Results showed that: (i) women reported greater sexual interest in, and fantasy about, non-primary partners near ovulation than during the luteal phase; (ii) women did not report significantly greater sexual interest in, and fantasy about, primary partners near ovulation; (iii) women reported that their primary partners were both more attentive and more proprietary near ovulation.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (113.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adams D. B., Gold A. R., Burt A. D. Rise in female-initiated sexual activity at ovulation and its suppression by oral contraceptives. N Engl J Med. 1978 Nov 23;299(21):1145–1150. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197811232992101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cerda-Flores R. M., Barton S. A., Marty-Gonzalez L. F., Rivas F., Chakraborty R. Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: a validation study with blood group markers. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1999 Jul;109(3):281–293. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199907)109:3<281::AID-AJPA1>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gangestad S. W., Thornhill R. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 May 22;265(1399):927–933. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guermandi E., Vegetti W., Bianchi M. M., Uglietti A., Ragni G., Crosignani P. Reliability of ovulation tests in infertile women. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jan;97(1):92–96. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01083-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guida M., Tommaselli G. A., Palomba S., Pellicano M., Moccia G., Di Carlo C., Nappi C. Efficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning program. Fertil Steril. 1999 Nov;72(5):900–904. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00365-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawkes K., O'Connell J. F., Jones N. G. Hunting income patterns among the Hadza: big game, common goods, foraging goals and the evolution of the human diet. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991 Nov 29;334(1270):243–251. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1991.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jennions M. D., Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21–64. doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macintyre S., Sooman A. Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening. Lancet. 1991 Oct 5;338(8771):869–871. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91513-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Penton-Voak I. S., Perrett D. I., Castles D. L., Kobayashi T., Burt D. M., Murray L. K., Minamisawa R. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature. 1999 Jun 24;399(6738):741–742. doi: 10.1038/21557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Persky H., Charney N., Lief H. I., O'Brien C. P., Miller W. R., Strauss D. The relationship of plasma estradiol to sexual behavior in young women. Psychosom Med. 1978 Nov;40(7):523–535. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197811000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rice W. R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):232–234. doi: 10.1038/381232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rikowski A., Grammer K. Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 May 7;266(1422):869–874. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasse G., Müller H., Chakraborty R., Ott J. Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. Hum Hered. 1994 Nov-Dec;44(6):337–343. doi: 10.1159/000154241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shellman-Reeve J. S., Reeve H. K. Extra-pair paternity as the result of reproductive transactions between paired mates. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 22;267(1461):2543–2546. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simpson J. A., Gangestad S. W., Christensen P. N., Leck K. Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jan;76(1):159–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh D., Bronstad P. M. Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 22;268(1469):797–801. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):452–460. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilcox A. J., Weinberg C. R., Baird D. D. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 7;333(23):1517–1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512073332301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]