Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 May 22;269(1495):1067–1072. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1965

Pre-ovulation control of hatchling sex ratio in the Seychelles warbler.

Jan Komdeur 1, Michael J L Magrath 1, Sven Krackow 1
PMCID: PMC1690984  PMID: 12028765

Abstract

Females of some bird species have a high degree of control over the sex ratio of their offspring at laying. Although several mechanisms have been put forward to explain how females might control the sex of their eggs, virtually nothing is known. As females are the heterogametic sex in birds, adjustment of the clutch sex ratio could arise either by pre- or post-ovulation control mechanisms. The Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis) exhibits extreme adaptive egg sex ratio bias. Typically, warblers produce only single-egg clutches, but by translocating pairs to vacant habitat of very high quality, most females were induced to produce two-egg clutches. Overall, females skewed clutch sex ratios strongly towards daughters (86.6%). This bias was evident in the first egg, but critically, also in the second eggs laid a day apart, even when all absent, unhatched, or unsexed second eggs were assumed to be male. Although a bias in the first egg may arise through either pre- or post-ovulation mechanisms, the skew observed in second eggs could only arise through pre-ovulation control. Post-ovulation adjustment may also contribute to skewed hatchling sex ratios, but as sex-biased release of gametes is likely to be a more efficient process of control, pre-ovulation mechanisms may be the sole means of adjustment in this species. High fitness differentials between sons and daughters, as apparent in the Seychelles warblers, may be necessary for primary sex ratio adjustment to evolve.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clutton-Brock T. H., Iason G. R. Sex ratio variation in mammals. Q Rev Biol. 1986 Sep;61(3):339–374. doi: 10.1086/415033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davison M. J., Ward S. J. Prenatal bias in sex ratios in a marsupial, Antechinus agilis. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Nov 7;265(1410):2095–2099. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton W. D. Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology. Science. 1967 Apr 28;156(3774):477–488. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3774.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. James W. H. A potential mechanism for sex ratio variation in mammals. J Theor Biol. 1997 Dec 7;189(3):253–255. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. James W. H. Continuing confusion. Nature. 1993 Sep 2;365(6441):8–8. doi: 10.1038/365008a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kilner R. Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):155–164. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Komdeur J. Seasonal timing of reproduction in a tropical bird, the Seychelles warbler: a field experiment using translocation. J Biol Rhythms. 1996 Dec;11(4):333–346. doi: 10.1177/074873049601100407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Komdeur Jan, Pen Ido. Adaptive sex allocation in birds: the complexities of linking theory and practice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):373–380. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krackow S. Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995 May;70(2):225–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kruuk L. E., Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D., Pemberton J. M., Guinness F. E. Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature. 1999 Jun 3;399(6735):459–461. doi: 10.1038/20917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nager R. G., Monaghan P., Griffiths R., Houston D. C., Dawson R. Experimental demonstration that offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 19;96(2):570–573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Petrie M., Schwabl H., Brande-Lavridsen N., Burke T. Maternal investment. Sex differences in avian yolk hormone levels. Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):498–499. doi: 10.1038/35087652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Reiss M. J. Evolutionary conflict over the control of offspring sex ratio. J Theor Biol. 1987 Mar 7;125(1):25–39. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80177-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Richardson D. S., Jury F. L., Blaakmeer K., Komdeur J., Burke T. Parentage assignment and extra-group paternity in a cooperative breeder: the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis). Mol Ecol. 2001 Sep;10(9):2263–2273. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01355.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Werren J. H. Sex ratio adaptations to local mate competition in a parasitic wasp. Science. 1980 Jun 6;208(4448):1157–1159. doi: 10.1126/science.208.4448.1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Williams T. D. Parental and first generation effects of exogenous 17beta-estradiol on reproductive performance of female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Horm Behav. 1999 Apr;35(2):135–143. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1998.1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES