Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Jun 7;269(1496):1129–1137. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1993

Age-specific survival and reproductive probabilities: evidence for senescence in male fallow deer (Dama dama).

Alan G McElligott 1, Res Altwegg 1, Thomas J Hayden 1
PMCID: PMC1691009  PMID: 12061956

Abstract

Survival and reproduction are key features in the evolution of life-history strategies. In this study, we use capture-mark-resighting and multi-state models to examine survival senescence and reproductive senescence in six successive cohorts of fallow bucks that were studied for 16 years. We found that the overall age-specific survival probabilities of males were highly variable and the best-fitting model revealed that fallow bucks have four life-history stages: yearling, pre-reproductive, prime-age and senescent. Pre-reproductive males (2 and 3 years old) had the highest survival. Survival declined sharply after the age of 9 years, indicating that senescence had begun. When we considered reproducing and non-reproducing males separately, there was no evidence of senescence in the former, and steadily decreasing survival after the onset of social maturity in the latter. Reproduction probability also declined in older males, and thus we provide very strong evidence of senescence. Reproducers had a greater chance of reproducing again in the following year than non-reproducers. Furthermore, there were differences in the survival probabilities, with reproducers consistently surviving better than non-reproducers. In our study population, reproducers allocate more to the effort to reproduce than non-reproducers. Therefore our results indicate the generally higher phenotypic quality of reproducing males. These results, along with earlier studies on the same population, could indicate positive relationships between fitness correlates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (147.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cheng J., Maquat L. E. Nonsense codons can reduce the abundance of nuclear mRNA without affecting the abundance of pre-mRNA or the half-life of cytoplasmic mRNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;13(3):1892–1902. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.3.1892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gaillard J. M., Festa-Bianchet M., Delorme D., Jorgenson J. Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Mar 7;267(1442):471–477. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton W. D. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol. 1966 Sep;12(1):12–45. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90184-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hicks R. J., Kalff V., MacManus M. P., Ware R. E., McKenzie A. F., Matthews J. P., Ball D. L. The utility of (18)F-FDG PET for suspected recurrent non-small cell lung cancer after potentially curative therapy: impact on management and prognostic stratification. J Nucl Med. 2001 Nov;42(11):1605–1613. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kirkwood T. B., Austad S. N. Why do we age? Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):233–238. doi: 10.1038/35041682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McElligott AG, Hayden TJ. Context-related vocalization rates of fallow bucks, Dama dama. Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):1095–1104. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McNamara J. M., Houston A. I. State-dependent life histories. Nature. 1996 Mar 21;380(6571):215–221. doi: 10.1038/380215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mcelligott AG, O'neill KP, Hayden TJ. Cumulative long-term investment in vocalization and mating success of fallow bucks, Dama dama. Anim Behav. 1999 May;57(5):1159–1167. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mysterud A., Yoccoz N. G., Stenseth N. C., Langvatn R. Effects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density-dependent senescence. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 7;268(1470):911–919. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Partridge L., Barton N. H. Optimality, mutation and the evolution of ageing. Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):305–311. doi: 10.1038/362305a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Partridge L., Prowse N., Pignatelli P. Another set of responses and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Feb 7;266(1416):255–261. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vaupel J. W., Yashin A. I. Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am Stat. 1985 Aug;39(3):176–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zwaan B. J. The evolutionary genetics of ageing and longevity. Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Jun;82(Pt 6):589–597. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00544.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES