Abstract
Secondary sexual characteristics may indicate quality of the immune system and therefore a preference for masculinity may confer genetic benefits to offspring; however, high masculinity may be associated with costs of decreased paternal investment. The current study examined women's preferences for masculinity in male faces by using computer graphics to allow transformation between feminine and masculine versions of individual male faces. We found that preferences for masculinity are increased when women either have a partner or are considering a short-term relationship. Such preferences are potentially adaptive, serving to: (i) maximize parental investment and cooperation in long-term relationships by biasing choices towards feminine faced males, and (ii) maximize possible good-gene benefits of short-term or extra-pair partners by biasing choices towards masculine faced males. We also found that individuals using oral contraception do not show the above effects, indicating that such hormonal intervention potentially disrupts women's choices for evolutionarily relevant benefits from males.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (114.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Buss D. M., Schmitt D. P. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):204–232. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chabbert Buffet N., Djakoure C., Maitre S. C., Bouchard P. Regulation of the human menstrual cycle. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1998 Jul;19(3):151–186. doi: 10.1006/frne.1998.0167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cunningham M. R., Barbee A. P., Pike C. L. What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):61–72. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frost P. Preference for darker faces in photographs at different phases of the menstrual cycle: preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship. Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Aug;79(1 Pt 2):507–514. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gangestad S. W., Simpson J. A. The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Aug;23(4):573–644. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x0000337x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grammer K., Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994 Sep;108(3):233–242. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langlois J. H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A. J., Larson A., Hallam M., Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2000 May;126(3):390–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little A. C., Burt D. M., Penton-Voak I. S., Perrett D. I. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):39–44. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Penton-Voak I. S., Perrett D. I., Castles D. L., Kobayashi T., Burt D. M., Murray L. K., Minamisawa R. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature. 1999 Jun 24;399(6738):741–742. doi: 10.1038/21557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perrett D. I., Lee K. J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D. M., Henzi S. P., Castles D. L., Akamatsu S. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998 Aug 27;394(6696):884–887. doi: 10.1038/29772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wedekind C., Füri S. Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1471–1479. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]