Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1289–1294. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2014

Sympatric populations of the highly cross-fertile coral species Acropora hyacinthus and Acropora cytherea are genetically distinct.

L M Márquez 1, M J H van Oppen 1, B L Willis 1, D J Miller 1
PMCID: PMC1691017  PMID: 12065046

Abstract

High cross-fertilization rates in vitro and non-monophyletic patterns in molecular phylogenies challenge the taxonomic status of species in the coral genus Acropora. We present data from eight polymorphic allozyme loci that indicate small, but significant, differentiation between sympatric populations of Acropora cytherea and Acropora hyacinthus (F(ST) = 0.025-0.068, p < 0.05), a pair of acroporid corals with very high interspecific fertilization rates in vitro. Although no fixed allelic differences were found between these species, the absence of genetic differentiation between widely allopatric populations suggests that allele frequency differences between A. cytherea and A. hyacinthus in sympatry are biologically significant. By contrast, populations of Acropora tenuis, a species which spawns 2-3 hours earlier and shows low cross-fertilization rates with congeners in vitro, were clearly distinct from A. cytherea and A. hyacinthus (F(ST) = 0.427-0.465, p < 0.05). Moreover, allopatric populations of A. tenuis differed significantly, possibly as a consequence of its relatively short period of larval competency. Our results effectively rule out the possibility that A. hyacinthus and A. cytherea are morphotypes within a single species, and indicate that hybridization occurs relatively infrequently between these taxa in nature.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (110.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayre D. J., Hughes T. P. Genotypic diversity and gene flow in brooding and spawning corals along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1590–1605. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Babcock R. Synchronous multispecific spawning on coral reefs: potential for hybridization and roles of gamete recognition. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995;7(4):943–950. doi: 10.1071/rd9950943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dieckmann U., Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):354–357. doi: 10.1038/22521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harrison P. L., Babcock R. C., Bull G. D., Oliver J. K., Wallace C. C., Willis B. L. Mass spawning in tropical reef corals. Science. 1984 Mar 16;223(4641):1186–1189. doi: 10.1126/science.223.4641.1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hatta M., Fukami H., Wang W., Omori M., Shimoike K., Hayashibara T., Ina Y., Sugiyama T. Reproductive and genetic evidence for a reticulate evolutionary history of mass-spawning corals. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Nov;16(11):1607–1613. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lopez J. V., Kersanach R., Rehner S. A., Knowlton N. Molecular determination of species boundaries in corals: genetic analysis of the Montastraea annularis complex using amplified fragment length polymorphisms and a microsatellite marker. Biol Bull. 1999 Feb;196(1):80–93. doi: 10.2307/1543170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Medina M, Weil E, Szmant AM. Examination of the Montastraea annularis Species Complex (Cnidaria: Scleractinia) Using ITS and COI Sequences. Mar Biotechnol (NY) 1999 Jan;1(1):89–97. doi: 10.1007/pl00011756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller P. J., Johnson D. I. Characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc42-1ts allele and new temperature-conditional-lethal cdc42 alleles. Yeast. 1997 May;13(6):561–572. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199705)13:6<561::AID-YEA114>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):583–590. doi: 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Odorico D. M., Miller D. J. Variation in the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rDNA among five species of Acropora (Cnidaria; Scleractinia): patterns of variation consistent with reticulate evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 May;14(5):465–473. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. van Oppen M. J., McDonald B. J., Willis B., Miller D. J. The evolutionary history of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) based on a mitochondrial and a nuclear marker: reticulation, incomplete lineage sorting, or morphological convergence? Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jul;18(7):1315–1329. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES