Abstract
Behavioural studies on normal and brain-damaged individuals provide convincing evidence that the perception of objects results in the generation of both visual and motor signals in the brain, irrespective of whether or not there is an intention to act upon the object. In this paper we sought to determine the basis of the motor signals generated by visual objects. By examining how the properties of an object affect an observer's reaction time for judging its orientation, we provide evidence to indicate that directed visual attention is responsible for the automatic generation of motor signals associated with the spatial characteristics of perceived objects.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (357.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Corbetta M., Shulman G. L. Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1353–1362. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craft J. L., Simon J. R. Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. J Exp Psychol. 1970 Mar;83(3):415–420. doi: 10.1037/h0028843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craighero L., Fadiga L., Rizzolatti G., Umiltà C. Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Dec;25(6):1673–1692. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer B., Breitmeyer B. Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1A):73–83. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldberg M. E., Segraves M. A. Visuospatial and motor attention in the monkey. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1A):107–118. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grèzes J., Decety J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(2):212–222. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lhermitte F. 'Utilization behaviour' and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain. 1983 Jun;106(Pt 2):237–255. doi: 10.1093/brain/106.2.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michaels C. F. S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 May;14(2):231–240. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.2.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicoletti R., Umiltà C. Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychol Res. 1994;56(3):144–150. doi: 10.1007/BF00419701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicoletti R., Umiltá C. Splitting visual space with attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Feb;15(1):164–169. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Proctor R. W., Lu C. H. Referential coding and attention-shifting accounts of the Simon effect. Psychol Res. 1994;56(3):185–195. doi: 10.1007/BF00419706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., Umiltá C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1A):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rubichi S., Nicoletti R., Iani C., Umiltà C. The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Oct;23(5):1353–1364. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.5.1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rumiati R. I., Humphreys G. W. Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Apr;24(2):631–647. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakata H., Taira M., Kusunoki M., Murata A., Tanaka Y. The TINS Lecture. The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action. Trends Neurosci. 1997 Aug;20(8):350–357. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01067-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheliga B. M., Craighero L., Riggio L., Rizzolatti G. Effects of spatial attention on directional manual and ocular responses. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Apr;114(2):339–351. doi: 10.1007/pl00005642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simon J. R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. J Exp Psychol. 1969 Jul;81(1):174–176. doi: 10.1037/h0027448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoffer T. H. Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychol Res. 1991;53(2):127–135. doi: 10.1007/BF01371820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tipper S. P., Howard L. A., Houghton G. Action-based mechanisms of attention. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1385–1393. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tipper S. P., Lortie C., Baylis G. C. Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):891–905. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):830–846. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wallace R. J. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. J Exp Psychol. 1971 Jun;88(3):354–360. doi: 10.1037/h0030892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]