Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1247–1251. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2016

History, environment and social behaviour: experimentally induced cooperative breeding in the carrion crow.

Vittorio Baglione 1, Daniela Canestrari 1, José M Marcos 1, Michael Griesser 1, Jan Ekman 1
PMCID: PMC1691025  PMID: 12065041

Abstract

Kin-based cooperative breeding, where grown offspring delay natal dispersal and help their parents to rear new young, has a long history in some avian lineages. Family formation and helping behaviour in extant populations may therefore simply represent the retention of ancestral features, tolerated under current conditions, rather than a current adaptive process driven by environmental factors. Separating these two possibilities challenges evolutionary biologists because of the tight coupling that normally exists between phylogeny and the environmental distribution of species and populations. The carrion crow Corvus corone corone, which exhibits extreme interpopulational variation in the extent of cooperative breeding, with populations showing no delayed dispersal and helping at all, provides a unique opportunity for an experimental approach. Here we show that offspring of non-cooperative carrion crows from Switzerland will remain on the natal territory and express helping behaviour when raised in a cooperative population in Spain. When we transferred carrion crow eggs from Switzerland to Spain, five out of six transplanted juveniles delayed dispersal, and two of those became helpers in the following breeding season. Our results provide compelling experimental evidence of the causal relationship between current environmental conditions and expression of cooperative behaviour.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Belthoff JR, Dufty jr AM Corticosterone, body condition and locomotor activity: a model for dispersal in screech-owls. Anim Behav. 1998 Feb;55(2):405–415. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emlen S. T. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8092–8099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gould S. J., Lewontin R. C. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):581–598. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Griffiths R., Double M. C., Orr K., Dawson R. J. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998 Aug;7(8):1071–1075. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harvey P. H., Purvis A. Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):619–624. doi: 10.1038/351619a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hatchwell BJ, Komdeur J. Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1079–1086. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koenig W. D., Pitelka F. A., Carmen W. J., Mumme R. L., Stanback M. T. The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. Q Rev Biol. 1992 Jun;67(2):111–150. doi: 10.1086/417552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Martins El. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jul;15(7):296–299. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01880-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES