Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1233–1239. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2005

Female choice depends on size but not symmetry of dorsal eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Casper J Breuker 1, Paul M Brakefield 1
PMCID: PMC1691026  PMID: 12065039

Abstract

The eyespots on the ventral wings of Bicyclus anynana butterflies are exposed when at rest and interact with predators. Those on the dorsal surface are not exposed in this way, and may be involved in courtship and mate choice. In this study, we examined whether the size and fluctuating asymmetry (FA) of dorsal eyespots are reliable signals of male quality. High developmental stability is considered to result in low FA, and to be associated with high quality. Individuals of high quality are predicted to produce sexually selected traits that are large and symmetrical, at a relatively low cost. In this study, we manipulated eyespot development to uncouple eyespot size and FA in order to examine their independent roles in signalling to the female. Individual females in cages were given the choice between two or three males differing in eyespot traits. The results indicate that although size per se of the eyespots is used as a signal, FA and wing size are not. We discuss the use of FA in studies of sexual selection and aspects of sexual selection on dorsal eyespot size.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (149.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bjorksten TA, Fowler K, Pomiankowski A. What does sexual trait FA tell us about stress? Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Apr;15(4):163–166. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01788-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brakefield P. M., French V. Eyespot development on butterfly wings: the epidermal response to damage. Dev Biol. 1995 Mar;168(1):98–111. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brakefield P. M., Gates J., Keys D., Kesbeke F., Wijngaarden P. J., Monteiro A., French V., Carroll S. B. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature. 1996 Nov 21;384(6606):236–242. doi: 10.1038/384236a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gangestad S. W., Bennett K. L., Thornhill R. A latent variable model of developmental instability in relation to men's sexual behaviour. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 22;268(1477):1677–1684. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Leung B, Forbes MR, Houle D. Fluctuating Asymmetry as a Bioindicator of Stress: Comparing Efficacy of Analyses Involving Multiple Traits. Am Nat. 2000 Jan;155(1):101–115. doi: 10.1086/303298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pryke S. R., Andersson S., Lawes M. J. Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display. Evolution. 2001 Jul;55(7):1452–1463. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00665.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rohde PA, Amundsen T, Fiske P. Fluctuating asymmetry, mate choice and experimental designs. Anim Behav. 1997 Oct;54(4):1030–1033. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Swaddle JP. Experimental design and the signalling properties of fluctuating asymmetry. Anim Behav. 1997 Oct;54(4):1034–1037. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zahavi A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES