Abstract
Animal communication occurs when an animal emits a signal, the signal is transmitted through the environment, and then detected by the receiver. The environment in which signalling occurs should govern the efficacy of this process. In this study, I examine the relationship of lighting environment (light transmission and tree cover), location and the relative abundances of male colour morphs across seven drainages and 30 populations in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei. I found that males with blue anal fins were more common in populations with low transmission of ultraviolet (UV) and blue wavelengths. By contrast, males with red anal fins (and to a lesser extent, males with yellow anal fins) were more common in populations with high transmission of UV and blue wavelengths. High UV-blue light transmission should create a blue visual background and may make blue males less conspicuous and red males more conspicuous to conspecifics. Colour contrast with the visual background may be more important than total brightness of the colour pattern. These results indicate that natural selection for effective intraspecific communication drives the relative abundance of male colour morphs in different lighting habitats.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (291.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Basolo A. L. Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science. 1990 Nov 9;250(4982):808–810. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4982.808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basolo A. L. Response. Science. 1991 Sep 20;253(5026):1426–1426. doi: 10.1126/science.253.5026.1426-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boughman J. W. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature. 2001 Jun 21;411(6840):944–948. doi: 10.1038/35082064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Endler J. A. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993 May 29;340(1292):215–225. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Endler J. A. Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Res. 1991;31(3):587–608. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90109-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Widemo F, Sæther SA. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Jan;14(1):26–31. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01531-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.