Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Jul 22;269(1499):1423–1428. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2031

Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus.

Elizabeth A Tibbetts 1
PMCID: PMC1691056  PMID: 12137570

Abstract

Individual recognition is an essential component of interactions in many social systems, but insects are often thought incapable of the sophistication necessary to recognize individuals. If this were true, it would impose limits on the societies that insects could form. For example, queens and workers of the paper wasp Polistes fuscatus form a linear dominance hierarchy that determines how food, work and reproduction are divided within the colony. Such a stable hierarchy would be facilitated if individuals of different ranks have some degree of recognition. P. fuscatus wasps have, to our knowledge, previously undocumented variability in their yellow facial and abdominal markings that are intriguing candidates for signals of individual identity. Here, I describe these highly variable markings and experimentally test whether P. fuscatus queens and workers use these markings to identify individual nest-mates visually. I demonstrate that individuals whose yellow markings are experimentally altered with paint receive more aggression than control wasps who are painted in a way that does not alter their markings. Further, aggression declines towards wasps with experimentally altered markings as these novel markings become familiar to their nestmates. This evidence for individual recognition in P. fuscatus indicates that interactions between insects may be even more complex than previously anticipated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (223.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C., McShea D. W. Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 May;76(2):211–237. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Heisenberg M. Pattern recognition in insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Aug;5(4):475–481. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Land M. F. Visual acuity in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:147–177. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Reeve H. K., Starks P. T., Peters J. M., Nonacs P. Genetic support for the evolutionary theory of reproductive transactions in social wasps. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 7;267(1438):75–79. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES