Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Aug 7;269(1500):1581–1589. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2049

Severe inbreeding depression in collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis).

Loeske E B Kruuk 1, Ben C Sheldon 1, Juha Merilä 1
PMCID: PMC1691074  PMID: 12184828

Abstract

The causes and magnitude of inbreeding depression are of considerable importance for a wide range of issues in evolutionary and conservation biology, but we have only a limited understanding of inbreeding depression in natural populations. Here, we present a study of inbreeding in a large wild population of collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis). Inbreeding was rare, to the extent that we detected only 1.04% of 2139 matings over 18 years that resulted in offspring with a non-zero inbreeding coefficient, f > 0. When it did occur, inbreeding caused a significant reduction in the egg-hatching rate, in fledgling skeletal size and in post-fledging juvenile survival, with the number of offspring being recruited to the breeding population from a nest of f = 0.25 being reduced by 94% relative to a non-inbred nest. A maximum-likelihood estimate of the number of lethal equivalents per gamete was very high at B = 7.47, indicating a substantial genetic load in this population. There was also a non-significant tendency for inbreeding depression to increase with the strength of selection on a trait. The probability of mating between close relatives (f = 0.25) increased throughout the breeding season, possibly reflecting increased costs of inbreeding avoidance. Our results illustrate how severe inbreeding depression and considerable genetic load may exist in natural populations, but detecting them may require extensive long-term datasets.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (148.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos W., Wilmer J. W., Fullard K., Burg T. M., Croxall J. P., Bloch D., Coulson T. The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 7;268(1480):2021–2027. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bulmer M. G. Inbreeding in the Great Tit. Heredity (Edinb) 1973 Jun;30(3):313–325. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1973.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crnokrak P., Roff D. A. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Sep;83(Pt 3):260–270. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grant P. R., Grant B. R., Petren K. A population founded by a single pair of individuals: establishment, expansion, and evolution. Genetica. 2001;112-113:359–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hansson B., Bensch S., Hasselquist D., Akesson M. Microsatellite diversity predicts recruitment of sibling great reed warblers. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 22;268(1473):1287–1291. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keller Lukas F., Grant Peter R., Grant B. Rosemary, Petren Kenneth. Environmental conditions affect the magnitude of inbreeding depression in survival of Darwin's finches. Evolution. 2002 Jun;56(6):1229–1239. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Meagher S., Penn D. J., Potts W. K. Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3324–3329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.060284797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Merilä J., Sheldon B. C., Kruuk L. E. Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations. Genetica. 2001;112-113:199–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morton N. E., Crow J. F., Muller H. J. AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956 Nov;42(11):855–863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.42.11.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Russell A. F., Hatchwell B. J. Experimental evidence for kin-biased helping in a cooperatively breeding vertebrate. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 22;268(1481):2169–2174. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sheldon BC, Ellegren H. Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):285–298. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Slate J., Kruuk L. E., Marshall T. C., Pemberton J. M., Clutton-Brock T. H. Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 22;267(1453):1657–1662. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Veen T., Borge T., Griffith S. C., Saetre G. P., Bures S., Gustafsson L., Sheldon B. C. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature. 2001 May 3;411(6833):45–50. doi: 10.1038/35075000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES