Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Aug 22;269(1501):1729–1733. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2088

Carotenoid concentration in barn swallow eggs is influenced by laying order, maternal infection and paternal ornamentation.

Nicola Saino 1, Vittorio Bertacche 1, Raffaella Paola Ferrari 1, Roberta Martinelli 1, Anders Pape Møller 1, Riccardo Stradi 1
PMCID: PMC1691081  PMID: 12204135

Abstract

Carotenoids are critical to embryonic development, immunity and protection from oxidative stress. Transmission of carotenoids to the eggs may affect development and maturation of immunity in offspring, but carotenoids may be available to females in limiting amounts. Females may thus transfer carotenoids to the eggs differentially in relation to the reproductive value of the offspring as affected by sexual ornamentation of their father. In this study of maternal allocation of carotenoids to the eggs in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica), females whose immune system had been experimentally challenged with an antigen had smaller lutein concentrations in their eggs than controls. We manipulated the size of a secondary sexual character (tail length) of males, and analysed the effect of manipulation on allocation of lutein to eggs by their vaccinated mates. Contrary to our prediction based on parental allocation theory, mates of tail-shortened males had a larger lutein concentration in their eggs compared with those of control and tail-elongated males. According to previous studies, offspring of short-tailed males have larger exposure and/or susceptibility to parasites. A larger lutein concentration in the eggs of females mated to males with experimentally reduced ornaments may thus reflect adaptive maternal strategies to enhance offspring viability.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (93.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blount JD, Houston DC, Møller AP. Why egg yolk is yellow. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Feb;15(2):47–49. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01774-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chew B. P. Role of carotenoids in the immune response. J Dairy Sci. 1993 Sep;76(9):2804–2811. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77619-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cunningham E. J., Russell A. F. Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature. 2000 Mar 2;404(6773):74–77. doi: 10.1038/35003565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edge R., McGarvey D. J., Truscott T. G. The carotenoids as anti-oxidants--a review. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1997 Dec;41(3):189–200. doi: 10.1016/s1011-1344(97)00092-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hill GE. Is There an Immunological Cost to Carotenoid-Based Ornamental Coloration? Am Nat. 1999 Nov;154(5):589–595. doi: 10.1086/303264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McGraw K. J., Hill G. E. Differential effects of endoparasitism on the expression of carotenoid- and melanin-based ornamental coloration. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 7;267(1452):1525–1531. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saino N, Stradi R, Ninni P, Pini E, Møller AP. Carotenoid Plasma Concentration, Immune Profile, and Plumage Ornamentation of Male Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica). Am Nat. 1999 Oct;154(4):441–448. doi: 10.1086/303246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sheldon BC. Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):397–402. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01953-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shykoff J. A., Widmer A. Parasites and carotenoid-based signal intensity: how general should the relationship be? Naturwissenschaften. 1996 Mar;83(3):113–121. doi: 10.1007/BF01142175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES