Abstract
In many species, females display preferences for extreme male signal traits, but it has not been determined if such preferences evolve as a consequence of females gaining genetic benefits from exercising choice. If females prefer extreme male traits because they indicate male genetic quality that will enhance the fitness of offspring, a genetic correlation will evolve between female preference genes and genes that confer offspring fitness. We show that females of Drosophila serrata prefer extreme male cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) blends, and that this preference affects offspring fitness. Female preference is positively genetically correlated with offspring fitness, indicating that females have gained genetic benefits from their choice of males. Despite male CHCs experiencing strong sexual selection, the genes underlying attractive CHCs also conferred lower offspring fitness, suggesting a balance between sexual selection and natural selection may have been reached in this population.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blows Mark W. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 7;269(1496):1113–1118. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brooks R. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature. 2000 Jul 6;406(6791):67–70. doi: 10.1038/35017552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higgie M., Chenoweth S., Blows M. W. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):519–521. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5491.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick M., Barton N. H. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1282–1286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kokko Hanna, Brooks Robert, McNamara John M., Houston Alasdair I. The sexual selection continuum. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 7;269(1498):1331–1340. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Møller A. P. Male ornament size as a reliable cue to enhanced offspring viability in the barn swallow. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6929–6932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zahavi A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]