Abstract
Understanding the costs of signals used in fights is the key to understanding decisions made by contestants. Hermit crabs use shell rapping. This is a clearly defined agonistic signal, which can be quantified in temporal terms and in the power of the key shell-rapping signal component. We examine the relationship between the power expended by attacking hermit crabs and their consequent lactate levels. High power expenditure over the whole fight leads to high lactate, and attackers give up when lactate is high. Some defenders give up early in fights, particularly if the power of raps in early bouts they receive is high. These defenders and those not allowed to fight have low glucose, but those that successfully resist eviction have high glucose. Glucose is mobilized in an attempt to resist; nevertheless, some defenders that attempt resistance are still evicted by persistent attackers. Thus, early power of the signal is a major determinant of success for attackers, albeit at a cost. These data show the link between power, repetition of a signal, metabolic consequences and decisions of contestants in fights. The different activities, decisions and costs of the two roles are not adequately described by existing models of contests.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Briffa M., Elwood R. W. Cumulative or sequential assessment during hermit crab shell fights: effects of oxygen on decision rules. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 7;267(1460):2445–2452. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Briffa M., Elwood R. W. Decision rules, energy metabolism and vigour of hermit-crab fights. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 7;268(1478):1841–1848. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chapple W. D. Dynamics of reflex cocontraction in hermit crab abdomen: experiments and a systems model. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Jun;69(6):1904–1917. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.6.1904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engel P. C., Jones J. B. Causes and elimination of erratic blanks in enzymatic metabolite assays involving the use of NAD+ in alkaline hydrazine buffers: improved conditions for the assay of L-glutamate, L-lactate, and other metabolites. Anal Biochem. 1978 Aug 1;88(2):475–484. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90447-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grafen A. Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517–546. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neat FC, Huntingford FA, Beveridge MMC. Fighting and assessment in male cichlid fish: the effects of asymmetries in gonadal state and body size. Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):883–891. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Payne RJH. Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):651–662. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RAABO E., TERKILDSEN T. C. On the enzymatic determination of blood glucose. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1960;12(4):402–407. doi: 10.3109/00365516009065404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sneddon LU, Taylor AC, Huntingford FA. Metabolic consequences of agonistic behaviour: crab fights in declining oxygen tensions. Anim Behav. 1999 Feb;57(2):353–363. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]