Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Nov 22;269(1507):2291–2299. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2129

Older males signal more reliably.

Stephen R Proulx 1, Troy Day 1, Locke Rowe 1
PMCID: PMC1691170  PMID: 12495495

Abstract

The hypothesis that females prefer older males because they have higher mean fitness than younger males has been the centre of recent controversy. These discussions have focused on the success of a female who prefers males of a particular age class when age cues, but not quality cues, are available. Thus, if the distribution of male quality changes with age, such that older males have on average genotypes with higher fitness than younger males, then a female who mates with older males has fitter offspring, which allows the female preference to spread through a genetic correlation. We develop a general model for male display in a species with multiple reproductive bouts that allows us to identify the conditions that promote reliable signalling within an age class. Because males have opportunities for future reproduction, they will reduce their levels of advertising compared with a semelparous species. In addition, because higher-quality males have more future reproduction, they will reduce their advertising more than low-quality males. Thus, the conditions for reliable signalling in a semelparous organism are generally not sufficient to produce reliable signalling in species with multiple reproductive bouts. This result is due to the possibility of future reproduction so that, as individuals age and the opportunities for future reproduction fade, signalling becomes more reliable. This provides a novel rationale for female preference for older mates; older males reveal more information in their sexual displays.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brooks R., Kemp D. J. Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jun 1;16(6):308–313. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02147-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Candolin U. Changes in expression and honesty of sexual signalling over the reproductive lifetime of sticklebacks. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 7;267(1460):2425–2430. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Candolin U. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim Behav. 1999 Dec;58(6):1261–1267. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Getty T. Handicap signalling: when fecundity and viability do not add up. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):127–130. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grafen A. Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517–546. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jennions M. D., Møller A. P., Petrie M. Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q Rev Biol. 2001 Mar;76(1):3–36. doi: 10.1086/393743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnstone R. A., Grafen A. Error-prone signalling. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 22;248(1323):229–233. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones T. M., Balmford A., Quinnell R. J. Adaptive female choice for middle-aged mates in a lekking sandfly. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 7;267(1444):681–686. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mack P. D., Lester V. K., Promislow D. E. Age-specific effects of novel mutations in Drosophila melanogaster II. Fecundity and male mating ability. Genetica. 2000;110(1):31–41. doi: 10.1023/a:1017538505627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PÄRT T, Qvarnström A. Badge size in collared flycatchers predicts outcome of male competition over territories. Anim Behav. 1997 Oct;54(4):893–899. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Price D. K., Hansen T. F. How does offspring quality change with age in male Drosophila melanogaster? Behav Genet. 1998 Sep;28(5):395–402. doi: 10.1023/a:1021677804038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Proulx S. R. Can behavioural constraints alter the stability of signalling equilibria? Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 22;268(1483):2307–2313. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Proulx S. R. Female choice via indicator traits easily evolves in the face of recombination and migration. Evolution. 2001 Dec;55(12):2401–2411. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00755.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Richardson DS, Burke T. Extra-pair paternity in relation to male age in Bullock's orioles. Mol Ecol. 1999 Dec;8(12):2115–2126. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zahavi A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zahavi A. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J Theor Biol. 1977 Aug 7;67(3):603–605. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90061-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
12495495s01.pdf (120.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES