Abstract
Few studies have influenced thought on the nature of sexual selection to the extent of the classic paper of A. J. Bateman on mating patterns in Drosophila. However, interpretation of his study remains controversial, and a lack of modern empirical evidence prevents a consensus with respect to the perceived utility of Bateman's principles in the study of sexual selection. Here, we use a genetic study of natural mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt, Taricha granulosa, to investigate the concordance between Bateman's principles and the intensity of sexual selection. We found that males experienced strong sexual selection on tail height and body size, while sexual selection was undetectable in females. This direct quantification of sexual selection agreed perfectly with inferences that are based on Bateman's principles. Specifically, males (in comparison with females) exhibited greater standardized variances in reproductive and mating success, as well as a stronger relationship between mating success and reproductive success. Overall, our results illustrate that Bateman's principles provide the only quantitative measures of the mating system with explicit connections to formal selection theory and should be the central focus of studies of mating patterns in natural populations.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (189.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- CROW J. F. Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum Biol. 1958 Feb;30(1):1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clutton-Brock T. H., Vincent A. C. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature. 1991 May 2;351(6321):58–60. doi: 10.1038/351058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garant D., Dodson J. J., Bernatchez L. A genetic evaluation of mating system and determinants of individual reproductive success in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J Hered. 2001 Mar-Apr;92(2):137–145. doi: 10.1093/jhered/92.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones A. G., Rosenqvist G., Berglund A., Arnold S. J., Avise J. C. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 7;267(1444):677–680. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones A. G., Walker D., Avise J. C. Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 22;268(1485):2531–2535. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones Adam G., Adams Erika M., Arnold Stevan J. Topping off: a mechanism of first-male sperm precedence in a vertebrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 12;99(4):2078–2081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.042510199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kokko H, Mackenzie A, Reynolds JD, Lindström J, Sutherland WJ. Measures of Inequality Are Not Equal. Am Nat. 1999 Sep;154(3):358–382. doi: 10.1086/303235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall T. C., Slate J., Kruuk L. E., Pemberton J. M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 1998 May;7(5):639–655. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]