Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Dec 22;269(1509):2519–2524. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2172

Song and the song control pathway in the brain can develop independently of exposure to song in the sedge warbler.

Stefan Leitner 1, Joanne Nicholson 1, Bernd Leisler 1, Timothy J DeVoogd 1, Clive K Catchpole 1
PMCID: PMC1691192  PMID: 12573065

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that female sedge warblers choose to mate with males that have more complex songs, and sexual selection has driven the evolution of both song complexity and the size of the major song control area (HVc) in the brain. In songbirds, learning from conspecifics plays a major role in song development and this study investigates the effects of isolation and exposure to song on song structure and the underlying song control system. Sibling pairs of hand-reared nestling sedge warblers were reared to sexual maturity under two conditions. Siblings in one group were reared individually in acoustic isolation in separate soundproof chambers. In the other group, siblings were reared together in an aviary with playback of recorded songs. The following spring, analysis of songs revealed that siblings reared in acoustic isolation produced normal song structures, including larger syllable repertoires than those exposed to song. We found no significant differences in the volumes of HVc, nucleus robustus archistnatalis, the lateral portion of the magnocellular nucleus and the density of dendritic spines between the two groups. Males exceeded females in all these measures, and also had a larger telencephalon. Our experiments show that complex song, sexual dimorphism in brain structure, and the size of song nuclei can all develop independently of exposure to song. These findings have important implications for how sexual selection can operate upon a complex male trait such as song and how it may also shape the more general evolution of brain structure in songbirds.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (408.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Airey D. C., Buchanan K. L., Szekely T., Catchpole C. K., DeVoogd T. J. Song, sexual selection, and a song control nucleus (HVc) in the brains of European sedge warblers. J Neurobiol. 2000 Jul;44(1):1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Airey D. C., Castillo-Juarez H., Casella G., Pollak E. J., DeVoogd T. J. Variation in the volume of zebra finch song control nuclei is heritable: developmental and evolutionary implications. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 22;267(1457):2099–2104. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Airey D. C., DeVoogd T. J. Greater song complexity is associated with augmented song system anatomy in zebra finches. Neuroreport. 2000 Jul 14;11(10):2339–2344. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200007140-00054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Airey D. C., Kroodsma D. E., DeVoogd T. J. Differences in the complexity of song tutoring cause differences in the amount learned and in dendritic spine density in a songbird telencephalic song control nucleus. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000 May;73(3):274–281. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1999.3937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ball G. F., MacDougall-Shackleton S. A. Sex differences in songbirds 25 years later: what have we learned and where do we go? Microsc Res Tech. 2001 Sep 15;54(6):327–334. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benton S., Cardin J. A., DeVoogd T. J. Lucifer Yellow filling of area X-projecting neurons in the high vocal center of female canaries. Brain Res. 1998 Jul 13;799(1):138–147. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00485-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brainard Michael S., Doupe Allison J. What songbirds teach us about learning. Nature. 2002 May 16;417(6886):351–358. doi: 10.1038/417351a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brenowitz E. A. Comparative approaches to the avian song system. J Neurobiol. 1997 Nov;33(5):517–531. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(19971105)33:5<517::aid-neu3>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brenowitz E. A., Lent K., Kroodsma D. E. Brain space for learned song in birds develops independently of song learning. J Neurosci. 1995 Sep;15(9):6281–6286. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-06281.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brenowitz E. A., Nalls B., Kroodsma D. E., Horning C. Female marsh wrens do not provide evidence of anatomical specializations of song nuclei for perception of male song. J Neurobiol. 1994 Feb;25(2):197–208. doi: 10.1002/neu.480250210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burek M. J., Nordeen K. W., Nordeen E. J. Neuron loss and addition in developing zebra finch song nuclei are independent of auditory experience during song learning. J Neurobiol. 1991 Apr;22(3):215–223. doi: 10.1002/neu.480220302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Devoogd T. J., Krebs J. R., Healy S. D., Purvis A. Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Nov 22;254(1340):75–82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gahr M., Sonnenschein E., Wickler W. Sex difference in the size of the neural song control regions in a dueting songbird with similar song repertoire size of males and females. J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 1;18(3):1124–1131. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-03-01124.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glaser E. M., Van der Loos H. Analysis of thick brain sections by obverse-reverse computer microscopy: application of a new, high clarity Golgi-Nissl stain. J Neurosci Methods. 1981 Aug;4(2):117–125. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(81)90045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffiths R., Double M. C., Orr K., Dawson R. J. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998 Aug;7(8):1071–1075. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kroodsma DE, Houlihan PW, Fallon PA, Wells JA. Song development by grey catbirds. Anim Behav. 1997 Aug;54(2):457–464. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MacDougall-Shackleton S. A., Ball G. F. Comparative studies of sex differences in the song-control system of songbirds. Trends Neurosci. 1999 Oct;22(10):432–436. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01434-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marler P., Peters S. Developmental overproduction and selective attrition: new processes in the epigenesis of birdsong. Dev Psychobiol. 1982 Jul;15(4):369–378. doi: 10.1002/dev.420150409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nixdorf B. E., Davis S. S., DeVoogd T. J. Morphology of Golgi-impregnated neurons in hyperstriatum ventralis, pars caudalis in adult male and female canaries. J Comp Neurol. 1989 Jun 15;284(3):337–349. doi: 10.1002/cne.902840302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nottebohm F., Kasparian S., Pandazis C. Brain space for a learned task. Brain Res. 1981 May 25;213(1):99–109. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)91250-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nottebohm F., Stokes T. M., Leonard C. M. Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius. J Comp Neurol. 1976 Feb 15;165(4):457–486. doi: 10.1002/cne.901650405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vu E. T., Mazurek M. E., Kuo Y. C. Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of zebra finches. J Neurosci. 1994 Nov;14(11 Pt 2):6924–6934. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-06924.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yu A. C., Margoliash D. Temporal hierarchical control of singing in birds. Science. 1996 Sep 27;273(5283):1871–1875. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5283.1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES