Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Dec 22;269(1509):2503–2507. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2187

Active formation of mixed-species grouse leks: a role for predation in lek evolution?

Robert M Gibson 1, Andrea S Aspbury 1, Leonard L McDaniel 1
PMCID: PMC1691199  PMID: 12573063

Abstract

Behavioural ecologists have interpreted avian leks as products of sexual selection, in which males display socially to increase their opportunities to mate. However, without invoking reproductive queuing or kin selection, this paradigm does not necessarily explain why many males that fail to mate participate in leks. An alternative solution, that males also aggregate to reduce predation, has previously lacked compelling support. We show that mixed-species leks, comprising two congeneric grouse, form when single males or small groups of one species, the greater prairie chicken Tympanuchus cupido, join leks of another, the sharp-tailed grouse T. phasianellus. We documented the process by observing lek dynamics and comparing group sizes between mixed- and single-species leks. Joining implies that prairie chickens benefit from displaying with sharp-tailed grouse. The numbers of females of each species attending a lek increased with the number of conspecific, but not heterospecific, males. This suggests that the joining of heterospecifics is unlikely to increase mating opportunities, and leaves lowered predation risk as the most likely benefit of associating with heterospecifics. Active formation of mixed-species leks therefore suggests that predation may be sufficient to drive lek formation. The benefits of participation in mixed leks may be asymmetrical because prairie chickens display more and are less vigilant than sharp-tailed grouse.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (187.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dolby AS, Grubb jr TC Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis. Anim Behav. 1998 Aug;56(2):501–509. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McDonald D. B., Potts W. K. Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science. 1994 Nov 11;266(5187):1030–1032. doi: 10.1126/science.7973654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Noë R., Bshary R. The formation of red colobus-diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Feb 22;264(1379):253–259. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wiley R. H. Evolution of social organization and life-history patterns among grouse. Q Rev Biol. 1974 Sep;49(3):201–227. doi: 10.1086/408083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES