Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Jan 7;270(1510):13–18. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2194

Ecological stress and sex evolution in soil microfungi.

Isabella Grishkan 1, Abraham B Korol 1, Eviatar Nevo 1, Solomon P Wasser 1
PMCID: PMC1691208  PMID: 12590766

Abstract

The elucidation of the origin and maintenance of sex is a major unsolved problem in evolutionary biology. A number of hypotheses have been elaborated, but the scarcity of empirical data limits further progress. During recent years, the general inclination has changed towards pluralistic models of sex evolution, due partly to an increased diversity of studied organisms. Fungi are among the most promising organisms for testing sexual causation, as demonstrated in recent laboratory experiments. However, reconciling theory and evidence necessitates critical field observations. Here, we report new estimates of the distribution of morphologically sexual and asexual soil microfungi in nature, which indicate a remarkable trend towards increased sexuality with increasing climatic stress.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (284.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H., Charlesworth B. Why sex and recombination? Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):1986–1990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birdsell J., Wills C. Significant competitive advantage conferred by meiosis and syngamy in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):908–912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burt A., Carter D. A., Koenig G. L., White T. J., Taylor J. W. Molecular markers reveal cryptic sex in the human pathogen Coccidioides immitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):770–773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burt A. Perspective: sex, recombination, and the efficacy of selection--was Weismann right? Evolution. 2000 Apr;54(2):337–351. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00038.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Flexon P. B., Rodell C. F. Genetic recombination and directional selection for DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1982 Aug 12;298(5875):672–674. doi: 10.1038/298672a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Geiser D. M., Pitt J. I., Taylor J. W. Cryptic speciation and recombination in the aflatoxin-producing fungus Aspergillus flavus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jan 6;95(1):388–393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.1.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gorodetskii V. P., Zhuchenko A. A., Korol' A. B. Effektivnost' sopriazhennogo otbora po rekombinatsii u Drozofily. Genetika. 1990 Nov;26(11):1942–1952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greig D., Borts R. H., Louis E. J. The effect of sex on adaptation to high temperature in heterozygous and homozygous yeast. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jun 7;265(1400):1017–1023. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kidwell M. G., Lisch D. Transposable elements as sources of variation in animals and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22;94(15):7704–7711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kondrashov A. S. Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. J Hered. 1993 Sep-Oct;84(5):372–387. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Korol A. B., Iliadi K. G. Increased recombination frequencies resulting from directional selection for geotaxis in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 1994 Jan;72(Pt 1):64–68. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lamb B. C., Saleem M., Scott W., Thapa N., Nevo E. Inherited and environmentally induced differences in mutation frequencies between wild strains of Sordaria fimicola from "Evolution Canyon". Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):87–99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.1.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lenormand T., Otto S. P. The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):423–438. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nevo E. Evolution of genome-phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6233–6240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101109298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Otto S. P., Barton N. H. Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution. 2001 Oct;55(10):1921–1931. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Otto S. P., Barton N. H. The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):879–906. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Otto Sarah P., Lenormand Thomas. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):252–261. doi: 10.1038/nrg761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pylkov K. V., Zhivotovsky L. A., Feldman M. W. Migration versus mutation in the evolution of recombination under multilocus selection. Genet Res. 1998 Jun;71(3):247–256. doi: 10.1017/s0016672398003243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rice William R. Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination. Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):241–251. doi: 10.1038/nrg760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Saleem M., Lamb B. C., Nevo E. Inherited differences in crossing over and gene conversion frequencies between wild strains of Sordaria fimicola from "Evolution Canyon". Genetics. 2001 Dec;159(4):1573–1593. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.4.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Fisher MC. THE EVOLUTION OF ASEXUAL FUNGI: Reproduction, Speciation and Classification. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1999;37(NaN):197–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.37.1.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zeyl C., Bell G. The advantage of sex in evolving yeast populations. Nature. 1997 Jul 31;388(6641):465–468. doi: 10.1038/41312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES