Abstract
Recent behavioural experiments have shown that birds use ultraviolet (UV)-reflective and fluorescent plumage as cues in mate choice. It remains controversial, however, whether such UV signals play a special role in sexual communication, or whether they are part of general plumage coloration. We use a comparative approach to test for a general association between sexual signalling and either UV-reflective or fluorescent plumage. Among the species surveyed, 72% have UV colours and there is a significant positive association between UV reflectance and courtship displays. Among parrots (Psittaciformes), 68% of surveyed species have fluorescent plumage, and again there is a strong positive association between courtship displays and fluorescence. These associations are not artefacts of the plumage used in courtship displays, being generally more 'colourful' because there is no association between display and colours lacking UV reflectance or fluorescence. Equally, these associations are not phylogenetic artefacts because all results remain unchanged when families or genera, rather than species, are used as independent data points. We also find that, in parrots, fluorescent plumage is usually found adjacent to UV-reflective plumage. Using a simple visual model to examine one parrot, the budgerigar Melopsittacus undulatus, we show that the juxtaposition of UV-reflective and fluorescent plumage leads to a 25-fold increase in chromatic contrast to the budgerigar's visual system. Taken together, these results suggest that signals based on UV contrast are of special importance in the context of active sexual displays. We review briefly six hypotheses on why this may be the case: suitability for short-range signalling; high contrast with backgrounds; invisibility to predators; exploitation of pre-existing sensory biases; advertisement of feather structure; and amplification of behavioural signals.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (120.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arnold Kathryn E., Owens Ian P. F., Marshall N. Justin. Fluorescent signaling in parrots. Science. 2002 Jan 4;295(5552):92–92. doi: 10.1126/science.295.5552.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennett A. T., Cuthill I. C., Partridge J. C., Lunau K. Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8618–8621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bowmaker J. K., Heath L. A., Wilkie S. E., Hunt D. M. Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds. Vision Res. 1997 Aug;37(16):2183–2194. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldsmith T. H. Ultraviolet receptors and color vision: evolutionary implications and a dissonance of paradigms. Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(11):1479–1487. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Govardovskii V. I. On the role of oil drops in colour vision. Vision Res. 1983;23(12):1739–1740. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hart N. S. The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001 Sep;20(5):675–703. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunt S., Cuthill I. C., Bennett A. T., Church S. C., Partridge J. C. Is the ultraviolet waveband a special communication channel in avian mate choice? J Exp Biol. 2001 Jul;204(Pt 14):2499–2507. doi: 10.1242/jeb.204.14.2499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunt S, Cuthill IC, Bennett AT, Griffiths R. Preferences for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit. Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):809–815. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs G. H. The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1993 Aug;68(3):413–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1993.tb00738.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owens Ian P. F. Male-only care and classical polyandry in birds: phylogeny, ecology and sex differences in remating opportunities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):283–293. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Pearn S. M., Bennett A. T., Cuthill I. C. Ultraviolet vision, fluorescence and mate choice in a parrot, the budgerigar Melopsittacus undulatus. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2273–2279. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prum R. O. Development and evolutionary origin of feathers. J Exp Zool. 1999 Dec 15;285(4):291–306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vorobyev M., Osorio D., Bennett A. T., Marshall N. J., Cuthill I. C. Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. J Comp Physiol A. 1998 Nov;183(5):621–633. doi: 10.1007/s003590050286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vos Hzn J. J., Coemans M. A., Nuboer J. F. The photopic sensitivity of the yellow field of the pigeon's retina to ultraviolet light. Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(11):1419–1425. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90142-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.