Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Jan 22;270(1511):215–224. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2219

The phenomenology of niche evolution via quantitative traits in a 'black-hole' sink.

R D Holt 1, R Gomulkiewicz 1, M Barfield 1
PMCID: PMC1691226  PMID: 12590763

Abstract

Previous studies of adaptive evolution in sink habitats (in which isolated populations of a species cannot persist deterministically) have highlighted the importance of demographic constraints in slowing such evolution, and of immigration in facilitating adaptation. These studies have relied upon either single-locus models or deterministic quantitative genetic formulations. We use individual-based simulations to examine adaptive evolution in a 'black-hole' sink environment where fitness is governed by a polygenic character. The simulations track both the number of individuals and their multi-locus genotypes, and incorporate, in a natural manner, both demographic and genetic stochastic processes. In agreement with previous studies, our findings reveal the central parts played by demographic constraints and immigration in adaptation within a sink (adaptation is more difficult in environments with low absolute fitness, and higher immigration can accelerate adaptation). A novel finding is that there is a 'punctuational' pattern in adaptive evolution in sink environments. Populations typically stay maladapted for a long time, and then rapidly shift into a relatively adapted state, in which persistence no longer depends upon recurrent immigration.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (549.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gomulkiewicz R., Holt R. D., Barfield M. The effects of density dependence and immigration on local adaptation and niche evolution in a black-hole sink environment. Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Jun;55(3):283–296. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kawecki T. J. Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of the dispersal rate on the fate of alleles with small and large effects. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jul 7;267(1450):1315–1320. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lande R. Expected time for random genetic drift of a population between stable phenotypic states. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Nov;82(22):7641–7645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.22.7641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ronce O., Kirkpatrick M. When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution. 2001 Aug;55(8):1520–1531. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tufto J. Quantitative genetic models for the balance between migration and stabilizing selection. Genet Res. 2000 Dec;76(3):285–293. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300004742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES