Abstract
Spring temperatures in temperate regions have increased over the past 20 years and many organisms have responded to this increase by advancing the timing of their growth and reproduction. However, not all populations show an advancement of phenology. Understanding why some populations advance and others do not will give us insight into the possible constraints and selection pressures on the advancement of phenology. By combining two decades of data on 24 populations of tits (Parus sp.) from six European countries, we show that the phenological response to large-scale changes in spring temperature varies across a species' range, even between populations situated close to each other. We show that this variation cannot be fully explained by variation in the temperature change during the pre- and post-laying periods, as recently suggested. Instead, we find evidence for a link between rising temperatures and the frequency of second broods, which results in complex shifts in the laying dates of first clutches. Our results emphasize the need to consider links between different life-history parameters in order to predict the ecological consequences of large-scale climate changes.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (192.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Both C., Visser M. E. Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird. Nature. 2001 May 17;411(6835):296–298. doi: 10.1038/35077063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown J. L., Li S. H., Bhagabati N. Long-term trend toward earlier breeding in an American bird: a response to global warming? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11;96(10):5565–5569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn P0, Winkler DW. Climate change has affected the breeding date of tree swallows throughout North America. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 22;266(1437):2487–2490. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Stevenson I. R., Bryant D. M. Climate change and constraints on breeding. Nature. 2000 Jul 27;406(6794):366–367. doi: 10.1038/35019151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visser M. E., Lessells C. M. The costs of egg production and incubation in great tits (Parus major). Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 22;268(1473):1271–1277. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walther Gian-Reto, Post Eric, Convey Peter, Menzel Annette, Parmesan Camille, Beebee Trevor J. C., Fromentin Jean-Marc, Hoegh-Guldberg Ove, Bairlein Franz. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389–395. doi: 10.1038/416389a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wuethrich B. Ecology. How climate change alters rhythms of the wild. Science. 2000 Feb 4;287(5454):793–795. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]