Abstract
The concept of a phylotypic stage, when all vertebrate embryos show low phenotypic diversity, is an important cornerstone underlying modern developmental biology. Many theories involving patterns of development, developmental modules, mechanisms of development including developmental integration, and the action of natural selection on embryological stages have been proposed with reference to the phylotypic stage. However, the phylotypic stage has never been precisely defined, or conclusively supported or disproved by comparative quantitative data. We tested the predictions of the 'developmental hourglass' definition of the phylotypic stage quantitatively by looking at the pattern of developmental-timing variation across vertebrates as a whole and within mammals. For both datasets, the results using two different metrics were counter to the predictions of the definition: phenotypic variation between species was highest in the middle of the developmental sequence. This surprising degree of developmental character independence argues against the existence of a phylotypic stage in vertebrates. Instead, we hypothesize that numerous tightly delimited developmental modules exist during the mid-embryonic period. Further, the high level of timing changes (heterochrony) between these modules may be an important evolutionary mechanism giving rise to the diversity of vertebrates. The onus is now clearly on proponents of the phylotypic stage to present both a clear definition of it and quantitative data supporting its existence.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Abouheif E., Akam M., Dickinson W. J., Holland P. W., Meyer A., Patel N. H., Raff R. A., Roth V. L., Wray G. A. Homology and developmental genes. Trends Genet. 1997 Nov;13(11):432–433. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01271-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen J. Development of the zootype. Nature. 1993 May 27;363(6427):307–308. doi: 10.1038/363307a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collazo A. Developmental variation, homology, and the pharyngula stage. Syst Biol. 2000 Mar;49(1):3–18. doi: 10.1080/10635150050207357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duboule D. Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Dev Suppl. 1994:135–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galis F., Metz J. A. Testing the vulnerability of the phylotypic stage: on modularity and evolutionary conservation. J Exp Zool. 2001 Aug 15;291(2):195–204. doi: 10.1002/jez.1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeffery Jonathan E., Bininda-Emonds Olaf R. P., Coates Michael I., Richardson Michael K. Analyzing evolutionary patterns in amniote embryonic development. Evol Dev. 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4):292–302. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2002.02018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimmel C. B., Ballard W. W., Kimmel S. R., Ullmann B., Schilling T. F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995 Jul;203(3):253–310. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002030302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson M. K., Hanken J., Gooneratne M. L., Pieau C., Raynaud A., Selwood L., Wright G. M. There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: implications for current theories of evolution and development. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1997 Aug;196(2):91–106. doi: 10.1007/s004290050082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson M. K. Heterochrony and the phylotypic period. Dev Biol. 1995 Dec;172(2):412–421. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.8041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson M. K. Vertebrate evolution: the developmental origins of adult variation. Bioessays. 1999 Jul;21(7):604–613. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199907)21:7<604::AID-BIES9>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson Michael K., Keuck Gerhard. Haeckel's ABC of evolution and development. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Nov;77(4):495–528. doi: 10.1017/s1464793102005948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rougvie A. E. Control of developmental timing in animals. Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Sep;2(9):690–701. doi: 10.1038/35088566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slack J. M., Holland P. W., Graham C. F. The zootype and the phylotypic stage. Nature. 1993 Feb 11;361(6412):490–492. doi: 10.1038/361490a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yost H. J. Diverse initiation in a conserved left-right pathway? Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999 Aug;9(4):422–426. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(99)80064-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.