Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):569–575. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2292

Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes.

Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter 1, Arno Kuhn 1
PMCID: PMC1691282  PMID: 12769455

Abstract

Honeybees communicate the distance and location of resource patches by bee dances, but this spatial information has rarely been used to study their foraging ecology. We analysed, for the first time to the best of the authors' knowledge, foraging distances and dance activities of honeybees in relation to landscape structure, season and colony using a replicated experimental approach on a landscape scale. We compared three structurally simple landscapes characterized by a high proportion of arable land and large patches, with three complex landscapes with a high proportion of semi-natural perennial habitats and low mean patch size. Four observation hives were placed in the centre of the landscapes and switched at regular intervals between the six landscapes from the beginning of May to the end of July. A total of 1137 bee dances were observed and decoded. Overall mean foraging distance was 1526.1 +/- 37.2 m, the median 1181.5 m and range 62.1-10037.1 m. Mean foraging distances of all bees and foraging distances of nectar-collecting bees did not significantly differ between simple and complex landscapes, but varied between month and colonies. Foraging distances of pollen-collecting bees were significantly larger in simple (1743 +/- 95.6 m) than in complex landscapes (1543.4 +/- 71 m) and highest in June when resources were scarce. Dancing activity, i.e. the number of observed bee dances per unit time, was significantly higher in complex than in simple landscapes, presumably because of larger spatial and temporal variability of resource patches in complex landscapes. The results facilitate an understanding of how human landscape modification may change the evolutionary significance of bee dances and ecological interactions, such as pollination and competition between honeybees and other bee species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (563.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dyer Fred C. The biology of the dance language. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:917–949. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Esch H. E., Zhang S., Srinivasan M. V., Tautz J. Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow. Nature. 2001 May 31;411(6837):581–583. doi: 10.1038/35079072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rieger Mary A., Lamond Michael, Preston Christopher, Powles Stephen B., Roush Richard T. Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science. 2002 Jun 28;296(5577):2386–2388. doi: 10.1126/science.1071682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Srinivasan M. V., Zhang S., Altwein M., Tautz J. Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer". Science. 2000 Feb 4;287(5454):851–853. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Steffan-Dewenter I., Münzenberg U., Tscharntke T. Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 22;268(1477):1685–1690. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES