Abstract
Male contests for access to receptive females are thought to have selected for the larger male body size and conspicuous weaponry frequently observed in mammalian species. However, when females copulate with multiple males within an oestrus, male reproductive success is a function of both pre- and postcopulatory strategies. The relative importance of these overt and covert forms of sexual competition has rarely been assessed in wild populations. The Soay sheep mating system is characterized by male contests for mating opportunities and high female promiscuity. We find that greater horn length, body size and good condition each independently influence a male's ability to monopolize receptive females. For males with large horns at least, this behavioural success translates into greater siring success. Consistent with sperm-competition theory, we also find that larger testes are independently associated with both higher copulation rates and increased siring success. This advantage of larger testes emerges, and strengthens, as the number of oestrous females increases, as dominant males can no longer control access to them all. Our results thus provide direct quantitative evidence that male reproductive success in wild populations of mammals is dependent upon the relative magnitude of both overt contest competition and covert sperm competition.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (177.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BEATTY R. A. Fertility of mixed semen from different rabbits. J Reprod Fertil. 1960 Feb;1:52–60. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0010052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coltman D. W., Festa-Bianchet M., Jorgenson J. T., Strobeck C. Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 22;269(1487):165–172. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall T. C., Slate J., Kruuk L. E., Pemberton J. M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 1998 May;7(5):639–655. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker G. A. Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J Theor Biol. 1982 May 21;96(2):281–294. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90225-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Preston B. T., Stevenson I. R., Pemberton J. M., Wilson K. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature. 2001 Feb 8;409(6821):681–682. doi: 10.1038/35055617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stockley P. No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1497–1500. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]