Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Apr 7;270(1516):731–733. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2279

Could Tyrannosaurus rex have been a scavenger rather than a predator? An energetics approach.

Graeme D Ruxton 1, David C Houston 1
PMCID: PMC1691292  PMID: 12713747

Abstract

Arguments on whether Tyrannosaurus rex was likely to have been an active predator or a scavenger have been based on evidence from jaw morphology and/or dentition. Here, we adopt an entirely novel approach, using energetic arguments to estimate the minimum productivity that would be required for an ecosystem to support a scavenger of the size of T. rex. We argue that an ecosystem as productive as the current Serengeti would provide sufficient carrion for such a scavenger. Hence, T. rex need not have been an active predator and could have found sufficient food purely by scavenging.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (113.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett A. F., Ruben J. A. Endothermy and activity in vertebrates. Science. 1979 Nov 9;206(4419):649–654. doi: 10.1126/science.493968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hutchinson John R., Garcia Mariano. Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner. Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1018–1021. doi: 10.1038/4151018a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES