Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Apr 7;270(1516):681–688. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2301

Decline of North Atlantic eels: a fatal synergy?

Thierry Wirth 1, Louis Bernatchez 1
PMCID: PMC1691294  PMID: 12713741

Abstract

Panmictic species pose particular problems for conservation because their welfare can be addressed effectively only on a global scale. We recently documented by means of microsatellite analysis that the European eel (Anguilla anguilla) is not panmictic but instead shows genetic isolation by distance. In this study, we extended the analysis to the American eel (A. rostrata) by applying identical analytical procedures and statistical power. Results obtained for the American eel were in sharp contrast with those obtained for the European eel: the null hypothesis of panmixia could not be rejected, and no isolation by distance was detected. This implies that the species must be managed as a single population. Using Bayesian statistics, we also found that the effective population sizes for both species were surprisingly low and that the populations had undergone severe contractions, most probably during the Wisconsinan glaciation. The apparent sensitivity of eels to climatic changes affecting the strength and position of the Gulf Stream 20,000 years ago is particularly worrying, given the effects of the ongoing global warming on the North Atlantic climate. Moreover, additional short-term stresses such as surging glass eel prizes, overfishing and lethal parasitic infections negatively affect eel population size. The fascinating transatlantic migration and life cycle of Atlantic eels is also their Achilles' heel as these negative short- and long-term effects will probably culminate in a fatal synergy if drastic conservation measures are not implemented to protect these international biological resources.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (361.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Attrill Martin J., Power Michael. Climatic influence on a marine fish assemblage. Nature. 2002 May 16;417(6886):275–278. doi: 10.1038/417275a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avise J. C., Ball R. M., Arnold J. Current versus historical population sizes in vertebrate species with high gene flow: a comparison based on mitochondrial DNA lineages and inbreeding theory for neutral mutations. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Jul;5(4):331–344. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avise J. C., Helfman G. S., Saunders N. C., Hales L. S. Mitochondrial DNA differentiation in North Atlantic eels: Population genetic consequences of an unusual life history pattern. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(12):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.12.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beaumont M. A. Detecting population expansion and decline using microsatellites. Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):2013–2029. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.4.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Edwards A. W. Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet. 1967 May;19(3 Pt 1):233–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keffer T., Martinson D. G., Corliss B. H. The position of the gulf stream during quaternary glaciations. Science. 1988 Jul 22;241(4864):440–442. doi: 10.1126/science.241.4864.440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lintas C, Hirano J, Archer S. Genetic variation of the european eel (Anguilla anguilla) . Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1998 Dec;7(4):263–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 1967 Feb;27(2):209–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Brien C. M., Fox C. J., Planque B., Casey J. Climate variability and North Sea cod. Nature. 2000 Mar 9;404(6774):142–142. doi: 10.1038/35004654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Page R. D. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996 Aug;12(4):357–358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pertoldi C., Hansen M. M., Loeschcke V., Madsen A. B., Jacobsen L., Baagoe H. Genetic consequences of population decline in the European otter (Lutra lutra): an assessment of microsatellite DNA variation in Danish otters from 1883 to 1993. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 7;268(1478):1775–1781. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Storz Jay F., Beaumont Mark A. Testing for genetic evidence of population expansion and contraction: an empirical analysis of microsatellite DNA variation using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):154–166. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00857.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson P. M., Ollason J. C. Lagged effects of ocean climate change on fulmar population dynamics. Nature. 2001 Sep 27;413(6854):417–420. doi: 10.1038/35096558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wirth T., Bernatchez L. Genetic evidence against panmixia in the European eel. Nature. 2001 Feb 22;409(6823):1037–1040. doi: 10.1038/35059079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES