Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Apr 7;270(1516):667–672. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2263

Predators favour mimicry in a tropical reef fish.

M Julian Caley 1, Dolph Schluter 1
PMCID: PMC1691296  PMID: 12713739

Abstract

Batesian mimicry evolves when the 'umbrella' of protection provided by resemblance to a conspicuous unpalatable model species is sufficient to overcome increased predation risk associated with greater conspicuousness. However, the shape and extent of this umbrella, that is, how the level of protection provided by mimicry changes with degree of resemblance between model and mimic, is poorly known. We investigated the response of wild predatory fishes to plastic replicas of a model-mimic species pair of tropical reef fishes, Canthigaster valentini (a toxic pufferfish, the model) and Paraluteres prionurus (the putative mimic), and additional replicas with progressively lower degrees of resemblance to the mimic species. Our results reveal a relatively broad region of protection, indicated by a reduced approach rate by piscivorous fishes, surrounding the colour pattern of the model species. Protection increased with increasing resemblance. By contrast, the response of non-piscivorous fishes was unrelated to degree of resemblance of replicas to the model. Our results suggest that piscivorous fishes on the reef are educated regarding the toxicity of C. valentini, and that avoidance of fish having the pufferfish colour pattern has generated selection favouring mimetic resemblance by the palatable P. prionurus. The relatively broad protective umbrella has probably facilitated the initial evolution of resemblance in the palatable prey species despite the potential hazards of greater conspicuousness.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (630.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Greene H. W., McDiarmid R. W. Coral snake mimicry: does it occur? Science. 1981 Sep 11;213(4513):1207–1212. doi: 10.1126/science.213.4513.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kapan D. D. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry. Nature. 2001 Jan 18;409(6818):338–340. doi: 10.1038/35053066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pfennig D. W., Harcombe W. R., Pfennig K. S. Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Nature. 2001 Mar 15;410(6826):323–323. doi: 10.1038/35066628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sternburg J. G., Waldbauer G. P., Jeffords M. R. Batesian mimicry: selective advantage of color pattern. Science. 1977 Feb 18;195(4279):681–683. doi: 10.1126/science.195.4279.681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES