Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Apr 22;270(1517):775–781. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2327

Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions.

Jonathan M Levine 1, Montserrat Vilà 1, Carla M D'Antonio 1, Jeffrey S Dukes 1, Karl Grigulis 1, Sandra Lavorel 1
PMCID: PMC1691311  PMID: 12737654

Abstract

Although the impacts of exotic plant invasions on community structure and ecosystem processes are well appreciated, the pathways or mechanisms that underlie these impacts are poorly understood. Better exploration of these processes is essential to understanding why exotic plants impact only certain systems, and why only some invaders have large impacts. Here, we review over 150 studies to evaluate the mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions on plant and animal community structure, nutrient cycling, hydrology and fire regimes. We find that, while numerous studies have examined the impacts of invasions on plant diversity and composition, less than 5% test whether these effects arise through competition, allelopathy, alteration of ecosystem variables or other processes. Nonetheless, competition was often hypothesized, and nearly all studies competing native and alien plants against each other found strong competitive effects of exotic species. In contrast to studies of the impacts on plant community structure and higher trophic levels, research examining impacts on nitrogen cycling, hydrology and fire regimes is generally highly mechanistic, often motivated by specific invader traits. We encourage future studies that link impacts on community structure to ecosystem processes, and relate the controls over invasibility to the controls over impact.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (165.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chittka L., Schürkens S. Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature. 2001 Jun 7;411(6838):653–653. doi: 10.1038/35079676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dukes JS, Mooney HA. Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Apr;14(4):135–139. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01554-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Richardson D. M., Allsopp N., D'Antonio C. M., Milton S. J., Rejmánek M. Plant invasions--the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):65–93. doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Vitousek P. M., Walker L. R., Whiteaker L. D., Mueller-Dombois D., Matson P. A. Biological Invasion by Myrica faya Alters Ecosystem Development in Hawaii. Science. 1987 Nov 6;238(4828):802–804. doi: 10.1126/science.238.4828.802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
12737654s01.pdf (621.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES