Abstract
The literature on sex ratio evolution in ant colonies is dominated by inclusive fitness arguments. In general, genetic theory makes good predictions about sexual investment in ant populations, but understanding colony-level variance in sex investment ratios has proven more difficult. Recently, however, more studies have addressed ecological factors that influence colony-level sex investment ratios. Food availability, in particular, has been manipulated because larval nutrition influences female caste determination, thus implying that resource availability should be of critical importance for colony sex investment ratios. However, results from food supplementation experiments are equivocal, and it is clear that ant colony response to food supplementation is dependent on the ecological background of the population. We presented field colonies of the ant Myrmica brevispinosa with two food types (proteins and carbohydrates), and assessed their relative impact on colony-level sex investment ratios. We show that colonies receiving carbohydrate enhancement invested in more female sexuals and produced more female-biased sex allocation ratios than protein-fed or control colonies. Thus, our study is the first, to our knowledge, to demonstrate that sex ratios in social insect colonies might be sensitive to resource quality. Male investment was not influenced by food treatment, but was positively correlated with colony size. Therefore, the shift in sex ratios in our study must have been mediated through nutritional influences on female caste determination rather than male brood elimination. We also used our data to evaluate evidence for sex ratio compensation by queenright colonies in response to male production by workers from orphaned colonies.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (184.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chapuis M, Keller L. Testing kin selection with sex allocation data in eusocial hymenoptera . Heredity (Edinb) 1999 May;82(Pt 5):473–478. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammond R. L., Bruford M. W., Bourke A. F. G. Ant workers selfishly bias sex ratios by manipulating female development. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 22;269(1487):173–178. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Julian Glennis E., Fewell Jennifer H., Gadau Jürgen, Johnson Robert A., Larrabee Debbie. Genetic determination of the queen caste in an ant hybrid zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(12):8157–8160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.112222099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sundstrom L, Chapuisat M, Keller L. Conditional Manipulation of Sex Ratios by Ant Workers: A Test of Kin Selection Theory. Science. 1996 Nov 8;274(5289):993–995. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5289.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trivers R. L., Hare H. Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect. Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):249–263. doi: 10.1126/science.1108197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volny Veronica P., Gordon Deborah M. Genetic basis for queen-worker dimorphism in a social insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 23;99(9):6108–6111. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092066699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]