Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 May 22;270(1519):1015–1022. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2335

Evolution as a critical component of plankton dynamics.

Gregor F Fussmann 1, Stephen P Ellner 1, Nelson G Hairston Jr 1
PMCID: PMC1691339  PMID: 12803890

Abstract

Microevolution is typically ignored as a factor directly affecting ongoing population dynamics. We show here that density-dependent natural selection has a direct and measurable effect on a planktonic predator-prey interaction. We kept populations of Brachionus calyciflorus, a monogonont rotifer that exhibits cyclical parthenogenesis, in continuous flow-through cultures (chemostats) for more than 900 days. Initially, females frequently produced male offspring, especially at high population densities. We observed rapid evolution, however, towards low propensity to reproduce sexually, and by 750 days, reproduction had become entirely asexual. There was strong selection favouring asexual reproduction because, under the turbulent chemostat regime, males were unable to mate with females, produced no offspring, and so had zero fitness. In replicated chemostat experiments we found that this evolutionary process directly influenced the population dynamics. We observed very specific but reproducible plankton dynamics which are explained well by a mathematical model that explicitly includes evolution. This model accounts for both asexual and sexual reproduction and treats the propensity to reproduce sexually as a quantitative trait under selection. We suggest that a similar amalgam of ecological and evolutionary mechanisms may drive the dynamics of rapidly reproducing organisms in the wild.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (405.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cousyn C., De Meester L., Colbourne J. K., Brendonck L., Verschuren D., Volckaert F. Rapid, local adaptation of zooplankton behavior to changes in predation pressure in the absence of neutral genetic changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 15;98(11):6256–6260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111606798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fussmann G. F., Ellner S. P., Shertzer K. W., Hairston N. G., Jr Crossing the hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. Science. 2000 Nov 17;290(5495):1358–1360. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5495.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gómez A., Carvalho G. R. Sex, parthenogenesis and genetic structure of rotifers: microsatellite analysis of contemporary and resting egg bank populations. Mol Ecol. 2000 Feb;9(2):203–214. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hendry A. P., Wenburg J. K., Bentzen P., Volk E. C., Quinn T. P. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):516–519. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5491.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Orr H. A. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):13–20. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reznick D. N., Ghalambor C. K. The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica. 2001;112-113:183–198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES