Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 May 22;270(1519):1023–1032. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2346

Functional consequences of genetic diversity in Strongyloides ratti infections.

S Paterson 1, M E Viney 1
PMCID: PMC1691343  PMID: 12803891

Abstract

Parasitic nematodes show levels of genetic diversity comparable to other taxa, but the functional consequences of this are not understood. Thus, a large body of theoretical work highlights the potential consequences of parasite genetic diversity for the epidemiology of parasite infections and its possible implications for the evolution of host and parasite populations. However, few relevant empirical data are available from parasites in general and none from parasitic nematodes in particular. Here, we test two hypotheses. First, that different parasitic nematode genotypes vary in life-history traits, such as survivorship and fecundity, which may cause variation in infection dynamics. Second, that different parasitic nematode genotypes interact within the host (either directly or via the host immune system) to increase the mean reproductive output of mixed-genotype infections compared with single-genotype infections. We test these hypotheses in laboratory infections using genetically homogeneous lines of Strongyloides ratti. We find that nematode genotypes do vary in their survivorship and fecundity and, consequently, in their dynamics of infection. However, we find little evidence of interactions between genotypes within hosts under a variety of trickle- and single-infected infection regimes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (127.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson T. J., Blouin M. S., Beech R. N. Population biology of parasitic nematodes: applications of genetic markers. Adv Parasitol. 1998;41:219–283. doi: 10.1016/s0065-308x(08)60425-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belosevic M., Dick T. A. Trichinella spiralis: comparison of stages in host intestine with those of an Arctic Trichinella sp. Exp Parasitol. 1979 Dec;48(3):432–446. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(79)90128-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chadee K. C., Dick T. A. Biological characteristics and host influence on a geographical isolate of Trichinella (wolverine: 55 degrees 00'N, 100 degrees 00'W, 1979). J Parasitol. 1982 Jun;68(3):451–456. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher M. C., Viney M. E. The population genetic structure of the facultatively sexual parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti in wild rats. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Apr 22;265(1397):703–709. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goyal P. K., Wakelin D. Vaccination against Trichinella spiralis in mice using antigens from different isolates. Parasitology. 1993 Sep;107(Pt 3):311–317. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000079282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harvey S. C., Gemmill A. W., Read A. F., Viney M. E. The control of morph development in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 22;267(1457):2057–2063. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harvey S. C., Paterson S., Viney M. E. Heterogeneity in the distribution of Strongyloides ratti infective stages among the faecal pellets of rats. Parasitology. 1999 Aug;119(Pt 2):227–235. doi: 10.1017/s0031182099004588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hodgkin J., Doniach T. Natural variation and copulatory plug formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):149–164. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pacala S. W., Dobson A. P. The relation between the number of parasites/host and host age: population dynamic causes and maximum likelihood estimation. Parasitology. 1988 Feb;96(Pt 1):197–210. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000081762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Paterson S. Use of repeated measure linear modeling to analyze longitudinal data from experimental parasite infections. J Parasitol. 2001 Oct;87(5):969–971. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[0969:UORMLM]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Paterson S., Viney M. E. Host immune responses are necessary for density dependence in nematode infections. Parasitology. 2002 Sep;125(Pt 3):283–292. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002002056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Paterson S., Viney M. E. The interface between epidemiology and population genetics. Parasitol Today. 2000 Dec;16(12):528–532. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(00)01776-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pozio E., La Rosa G., Rossi P., Murrell K. D. Biological characterization of Trichinella isolates from various host species and geographical regions. J Parasitol. 1992 Aug;78(4):647–653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Read A., Viney M. Helminth immunogenetics: Why bother? Parasitol Today. 1996 Sep;12(9):337–343. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(96)10056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rose M. R., Charlesworth B. Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Exploratory selection experiments. Genetics. 1981 Jan;97(1):187–196. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tindall N. R., Wilson P. A. Criteria for a proof of migration routes of immature parasites inside hosts exemplified by studies of Strongyloides ratti in the rat. Parasitology. 1988 Jun;96(Pt 3):551–563. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000080185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Viney M. E. A genetic analysis of reproduction in Strongyloides ratti. Parasitology. 1994 Nov;109(Pt 4):511–515. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000080768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Viney M. E. Developmental switching in the parasitic nematode Strongyloides ratti. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Feb 22;263(1367):201–208. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Viney M. E., Matthews B. E., Walliker D. On the biological and biochemical nature of cloned populations of Strongyloides ratti. J Helminthol. 1992 Mar;66(1):45–52. doi: 10.1017/s0022149x00012554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wakelin D., Goyal P. K. Trichinella isolates: parasite variability and host responses. Int J Parasitol. 1996 May;26(5):471–481. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(96)89377-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilson K., Grenfell B. T. Generalized linear modelling for parasitologists. Parasitol Today. 1997 Jan;13(1):33–38. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(96)40009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES