Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Jun 7;270(1520):1115–1121. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2349

Do fishes have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system.

Lynne U Sneddon 1, Victoria A Braithwaite 1, Michael J Gentle 1
PMCID: PMC1691351  PMID: 12816648

Abstract

Nociception is the detection of a noxious tissue-damaging stimulus and is sometimes accompanied by a reflex response such as withdrawal. Pain perception, as distinct from nociception, has been demonstrated in birds and mammals but has not been systematically studied in lower vertebrates. We assessed whether a fish possessed cutaneous nociceptors capable of detecting noxious stimuli and whether its behaviour was sufficiently adversely affected by the administration of a noxious stimulus. Electrophysiological recordings from trigeminal nerves identified polymodal nociceptors on the head of the trout with physiological properties similar to those described in higher vertebrates. These receptors responded to mechanical pressure, temperatures in the noxious range (more than 40 degrees C) and 1% acetic acid, a noxious substance. In higher vertebrates nociceptive nerves are either A-delta or C fibres with C fibres being the predominating fibre type. However, in the rainbow trout A-delta fibres were most common, and this offers insights into the evolution of nociceptive systems. Administration of noxious substances to the lips of the trout affected both the physiology and the behaviour of the animal and resulted in a significant increase in opercular beat rate and the time taken to resume feeding, as well as anomalous behaviours. This study provides significant evidence of nociception in teleost fishes and furthermore demonstrates that behaviour and physiology are affected over a prolonged period of time, suggesting discomfort.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (246.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Broom D. M. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci. 1991 Oct;69(10):4167–4175. doi: 10.2527/1991.69104167x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coggeshall R. E., Leonard R. B., Applebaum M. L., Willis W. D. Organization of peripheral nerves and spinal roots of the Atlantic stingray, Dasyatis sabina. J Neurophysiol. 1978 Jan;41(1):97–107. doi: 10.1152/jn.1978.41.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dawkins M. S. Evolution and animal welfare. Q Rev Biol. 1998 Sep;73(3):305–328. doi: 10.1086/420307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehrensing R. H., Michell G. F., Kastin A. J. Similar antagonism of morphine analgesia by MIF-1 and naloxone in Carassius auratus. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1982 Oct;17(4):757–761. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(82)90358-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gentle M. J. Sodium urate arthritis: effects on the sensory properties of articular afferents in the chicken. Pain. 1997 Apr;70(2-3):245–251. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)03324-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gonyou H. W. Why the study of animal behavior is associated with the animal welfare issue. J Anim Sci. 1994 Aug;72(8):2171–2177. doi: 10.2527/1994.7282171x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamamoto D. T., Forkey M. W., Davis W. L., Kajander K. C., Simone D. A. The role of pH and osmolarity in evoking the acetic acid-induced wiping response in a model of nociception in frogs. Brain Res. 2000 Apr 17;862(1-2):217–229. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02138-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Handwerker H. O., Anton F., Reeh P. W. Discharge patterns of afferent cutaneous nerve fibers from the rat's tail during prolonged noxious mechanical stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 1987;65(3):493–504. doi: 10.1007/BF00235972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kato Y., Kowalski C. J., Stohler C. S. Habituation of the early pain-specific respiratory response in sustained pain. Pain. 2001 Mar;91(1-2):57–63. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00419-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kavaliers M. Evolutionary and comparative aspects of nociception. Brain Res Bull. 1988 Dec;21(6):923–931. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(88)90030-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kenshalo D. R., Jr, Anton F., Dubner R. The detection and perceived intensity of noxious thermal stimuli in monkey and in human. J Neurophysiol. 1989 Aug;62(2):429–436. doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kotrschal K. Taste(s) and olfaction(s) in fish: a review of specialized sub-systems and central integration. Pflugers Arch. 2000;439(3 Suppl):R178–R180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lariviere W. R., Melzack R. The bee venom test: a new tonic-pain test. Pain. 1996 Aug;66(2-3):271–277. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03075-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leonard R. B. Primary afferent receptive field properties and neurotransmitter candidates in a vertebrate lacking unmyelinated fibers. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;176:135–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lyfenko A., Vlachová V., Vyklický L., Dittert I., Kress M., Reeh P. W. The effects of excessive heat on heat-activated membrane currents in cultured dorsal root ganglia neurons from neonatal rat. Pain. 2002 Feb;95(3):207–214. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00401-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Martínez V., Thakur S., Mogil J. S., Taché Y., Mayer E. A. Differential effects of chemical and mechanical colonic irritation on behavioral pain response to intraperitoneal acetic acid in mice. Pain. 1999 May;81(1-2):179–186. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mason G. J., Cooper J., Clarebrough C. Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature. 2001 Mar 1;410(6824):35–36. doi: 10.1038/35065157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Matzner O., Devor M. Contrasting thermal sensitivity of spontaneously active A- and C-fibers in experimental nerve-end neuromas. Pain. 1987 Sep;30(3):373–384. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90025-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roughan J. V., Flecknell P. A. Behavioural effects of laparotomy and analgesic effects of ketoprofen and carprofen in rats. Pain. 2001 Feb 1;90(1-2):65–74. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00387-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roveroni R. C., Parada C. A., Cecília M., Veiga F. A., Tambeli C. H. Development of a behavioral model of TMJ pain in rats: the TMJ formalin test. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):185–191. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00357-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sneddon Lynne U. Anatomical and electrophysiological analysis of the trigeminal nerve in a teleost fish, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Neurosci Lett. 2002 Feb 22;319(3):167–171. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02584-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Snow P. J., Plenderleith M. B., Wright L. L. Quantitative study of primary sensory neurone populations of three species of elasmobranch fish. J Comp Neurol. 1993 Aug 1;334(1):97–103. doi: 10.1002/cne.903340108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stevens C. W. Alternatives to the use of mammals for pain research. Life Sci. 1992;50(13):901–912. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(92)90167-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Torebjörk H. E., Hallin R. G. Identification of afferent C units in intact human skin nerves. Brain Res. 1974 Mar 8;67(3):387–403. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90489-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yeomans D. C., Proudfit H. K. Nociceptive responses to high and low rates of noxious cutaneous heating are mediated by different nociceptors in the rat: electrophysiological evidence. Pain. 1996 Nov;68(1):141–150. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03177-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES