Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Jun 22;270(1521):1315–1322. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2362

The adaptive significance of inquiline parasite workers.

Seirian Sumner 1, David R Nash 1, Jacobus J Boomsma 1
PMCID: PMC1691370  PMID: 12816646

Abstract

Social parasites exploit the socially managed resources of their host's society. Inquiline social parasites are dependent on their host throughout their life cycle, and so many of the traits inherited from their free-living ancestor are removed by natural selection. One trait that is commonly lost is the worker caste, the functions of which are adequately fulfilled by host workers. The few inquiline parasites that have retained a worker caste are thought to be at a transitional stage in the evolution of social parasitism, and their worker castes are considered vestigial and non-adaptive. However, this idea has not been tested. Furthermore, whether inquiline workers have an adaptive role outside the usual worker repertoire of foraging, brood care and colony maintenance has not been examined. In this paper, we present data that suggest that workers of the inquiline ant Acromyrmex insinuator play a vital role in ensuring the parasite's fitness. We show that the presence of these parasite workers has a positive effect on the production of parasite sexuals and a negative effect on the production of host sexuals. This suggests that inquiline workers play a vital role in suppressing host queen reproduction, thus promoting the rearing of parasite sexuals. To our knowledge, these are the first experiments on inquiline workers and the first to provide evidence that inquiline workers have an adaptive role.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (212.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Foitzik S., Herbers J. M. Colony structure of a slavemaking ant. I. Intracolony relatedness, worker reproduction, and polydomy. Evolution. 2001 Feb;55(2):307–315. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lenoir A., D'Ettorre P., Errard C., Hefetz A. Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:573–599. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  4. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sledge M. F., Dani F. R., Cervo R., Dapporto L., Turillazzi S. Recognition of social parasites as nest-mates: adoption of colony-specific host cuticular odours by the paper wasp parasite Polistes sulcifer. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2253–2260. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES