Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Aug 7;270(1524):1617–1622. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2409

Insurance-based advantages for subordinate co-foundresses in a temperate paper wasp.

Gavin Shreeves 1, Michael A Cant 1, Alan Bolton 1, Jeremy Field 1
PMCID: PMC1691415  PMID: 12908983

Abstract

Recent explanations for the evolution of eusociality, focusing more on costs and benefits than relatedness, are largely untested. We validate one such model by showing that helpers in foundress groups of the paper wasp Polistes dominulus benefit from an insurance-based mechanism known as Assured Fitness Returns (AFRs). Experimental helper removals left remaining group members with more offspring than they would normally rear. Reduced groups succeeded in preserving the dead helpers' investment by rearing these extra offspring, even when helper removals occurred long before worker emergence. While helpers clearly gained from AFRs, offspring of lone foundresses failed after foundress death, so that AFRs represent a true advantage for helpers. Smaller, less valuable offspring were probably sacrificed to feed larger offspring, but reduced groups did not preferentially attract joiners or increase their foraging effort to compensate for their smaller workforce. We failed to detect a second insurance-based advantage, Survivorship Insurance, in which larger groups are less likely to fail than smaller groups. We suggest that through their use of small offspring as a food store to cope with temporary shortages, wasps may be less susceptible than vertebrates to offspring failure following the death of group members.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cant M. A., Field J. Helping effort and future fitness in cooperation animal societies. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 22;268(1479):1959–1964. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Field J., Shreeves G., Sumner S., Casiraghi M. Insurance-based advantage to helpers in a tropical hover wasp. Nature. 2000 Apr 20;404(6780):869–871. doi: 10.1038/35009097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heinsohn R, Legge S. The cost of helping. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):53–57. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01545-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Queller D. C. The evolution of eusociality: Reproductive head starts of workers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(9):3224–3226. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.9.3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Queller D. C., Zacchi F., Cervo R., Turillazzi S., Henshaw M. T., Santorelli L. A., Strassmann J. E. Unrelated helpers in a social insect. Nature. 2000 Jun 15;405(6788):784–787. doi: 10.1038/35015552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES