Abstract
We present a model of a control programme for a disease outbreak in a population of livestock holdings. Control is achieved by culling infectious holdings when they are discovered and by the pre-emptive culling of livestock on holdings deemed to be at enhanced risk of infection. Because the pre-emptive control programme cannot directly identify exposed holdings, its implementation will result in the removal of both infected and uninfected holdings. This leads to a fundamental trade-off: increased levels of control produce a greater reduction in transmission by removing more exposed holdings, but increase the number of uninfected holdings culled. We derive an expression for the total number of holdings culled during the course of an outbreak and demonstrate that there is an optimal control policy, which minimizes this loss. Using a metapopulation model to incorporate local clustering of infection, we examine a neighbourhood control programme in a locally spreading outbreak. We find that there is an optimal level of control, which increases with increasing basic reproduction ratio, R(0); moreover, implementation of control may be optimal even when R(0) < 1. The total loss to the population is relatively insensitive to the level of control as it increases beyond the optimal level, suggesting that over-control is a safer policy than under-control.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (119.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Agur Z., Danon Y. L., Anderson R. M., Cojocaru L., May R. M. Measles immunization strategies for an epidemiologically heterogeneous population: the Israeli case study. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 May 22;252(1334):81–84. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elber A. R., Stegeman A., Moser H., Ekker H. M., Smak J. A., Pluimers F. H. The classical swine fever epidemic 1997-1998 in The Netherlands: descriptive epidemiology. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):157–184. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(99)00074-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibbens J. C., Sharpe C. E., Wilesmith J. W., Mansley L. M., Michalopoulou E., Ryan J. B., Hudson M. Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months. Vet Rec. 2001 Dec 15;149(24):729–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hutchinson H. L. The controls and eradication of Newcastle disease in Northern Ireland. Vet Rec. 1975 Mar 8;96(10):213–217. doi: 10.1136/vr.96.10.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keeling M. J., Woolhouse M. E., Shaw D. J., Matthews L., Chase-Topping M., Haydon D. T., Cornell S. J., Kappey J., Wilesmith J., Grenfell B. T. Dynamics of the 2001 UK foot and mouth epidemic: stochastic dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Science. 2001 Oct 3;294(5543):813–817. doi: 10.1126/science.1065973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leslie J. Newcastle disease: outbreak losses and control policy costs. Vet Rec. 2000 May 20;146(21):603–606. doi: 10.1136/vr.146.21.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Müller J., Schönfisch B., Kirkilionis M. Ring vaccination. J Math Biol. 2000 Aug;41(2):143–171. doi: 10.1007/s002850070003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielen M., Jalvingh A. W., Meuwissen M. P., Horst S. H., Dijkhuizen A. A. Spatial and stochastic simulation to evaluate the impact of events and control measures on the 1997-1998 classical swine fever epidemic in The Netherlands. II. Comparison of control strategies. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):297–317. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(99)00081-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stegeman A., Elbers A. R., Smak J., de Jong M. C. Quantification of the transmission of classical swine fever virus between herds during the 1997-1998 epidemic in The Netherlands. Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):219–234. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(99)00077-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]