Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Aug 22;270(1525):1685–1689. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2421

Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) inseminations are more likely to fertilize eggs in a context predicting mating opportunities.

Elizabeth Adkins-Regan 1, Emiko A MacKillop 1
PMCID: PMC1691436  PMID: 12964995

Abstract

Theoretical developments in behavioural ecology have generated increased interest in the proximate mechanisms underlying fertilization, but little is known about how fertilization success is regulated by cues from the external or social environment in males and females. Here, we use a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm to show that inseminations resulting from mating male and female Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) are more likely to fertilize eggs when they occur in a context predicting that an opposite-sex bird will appear than when they occur in a context predicting that an opposite-sex bird will not appear. This effect occurs when either the male or the female is the target of the conditioning. Thus, processes occurring during or after mating that contribute to fertilization success are subject to the influence of distal cues, confirming control by brain-level mechanisms. Conditioning is a widespread property of the nervous system and the demonstration that context conditioning can influence male and female reproductive success, and not simply mating success, has widespread implications for the fertilization successes of different types of copulation in natural mating systems.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adkins E. K. Electrical recording of copulation in quail. Physiol Behav. 1974 Sep;13(3):475–477. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(74)90103-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birkhead Timothy R., Pizzari Tommaso. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):262–273. doi: 10.1038/nrg774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Domjan M., Cusato B., Villarreal R. Pavlovian feed-forward mechanisms in the control of social behavior. Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Apr;23(2):235–282. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00002430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Freedman S. L., Akuffo V. G., Bakst M. R. Evidence for the innervation of sperm storage tubules in the oviduct of the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Reproduction. 2001 May;121(5):809–814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Graham J. M., Desjardins C. Classical conditioning: induction of luteinizing hormone and testosterone secretion in anticipation of sexual activity. Science. 1980 Nov 28;210(4473):1039–1041. doi: 10.1126/science.7434016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gutiérrez G., Domjan M. Differences in the sexual conditioned behavior of male and female Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). J Comp Psychol. 1997 Jun;111(2):135–142. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.2.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hollis K. L. Contemporary research on Pavlovian conditioning. A "new" functional analysis. Am Psychol. 1997 Sep;52(9):956–965. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.9.956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mathevon M., Buhr M. M., Dekkers J. C. Environmental, management, and genetic factors affecting semen production in Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci. 1998 Dec;81(12):3321–3330. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75898-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pfaus J. G., Kippin T. E., Centeno S. Conditioning and sexual behavior: a review. Horm Behav. 2001 Sep;40(2):291–321. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2001.1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pizzari T., Birkhead T. R. Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature. 2000 Jun 15;405(6788):787–789. doi: 10.1038/35015558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Popova N. K., Amstislavskaya T. G. Involvement of the 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) serotonergic receptor subtypes in sexual arousal in male mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2002 Jul;27(5):609–618. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(01)00097-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pound N. Effects of morphine on electrically evoked contractions of the vas deferens in two congeneric rodent species differing in sperm competition intensity. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Sep 7;266(1430):1755–1758. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Seiwert C. M., Adkins-Regan E. The foam production system of the male Japanese quail: characterization of structure and function. Brain Behav Evol. 1998;52(2):61–80. doi: 10.1159/000006553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Truitt William A., Coolen Lique M. Identification of a potential ejaculation generator in the spinal cord. Science. 2002 Aug 30;297(5586):1566–1569. doi: 10.1126/science.1073885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. White DJ, Galef BG., Jr Differences between the sexes in direction and duration of response to seeing a potential sex partner mate with another. Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1235–1240. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Woodson James C. Including 'learned sexuality' in the organization of sexual behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002 Jan;26(1):69–80. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00039-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES