Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1839–1847. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2395

Recent speciation in the Indo-West Pacific: rapid evolution of gamete recognition and sperm morphology in cryptic species of sea urchin.

C Landry 1, L B Geyer 1, Y Arakaki 1, T Uehara 1, Stephen R Palumbi 1
PMCID: PMC1691439  PMID: 12964987

Abstract

The rich species diversity of the marine Indo-West Pacific (IWP) has been explained largely on the basis of historical observation of large-scale diversity gradients. Careful study of divergence among closely related species can reveal important new information about the pace and mechanisms of their formation, and can illuminate the genesis of biogeographic patterns. Young species inhabiting the IWP include urchins of the genus Echinometra, which diverged over the past 1-5 Myr. Here, we report the most recent divergence of two cryptic species of Echinometra inhabiting this region. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) sequence data show that in Echinometra oblonga, species-level divergence in sperm morphology, gamete recognition proteins and gamete compatibility arose between central and western Pacific populations in the past 250 000 years. Divergence in sperm attachment proteins suggests rapid evolution of the fertilization system. Divergence of sperm morphology may be a common feature of free-spawning animals, and offers opportunities to simultaneously understand genetic divergence, changes in protein expression patterns and morphological evolution in traits directly related to reproductive isolation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (232.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barber P. H., Palumbi S. R., Erdmann M. V., Moosa M. K. Sharp genetic breaks among populations of Haptosquilla pulchella (Stomatopoda) indicate limits to larval transport: patterns, causes, and consequences. Mol Ecol. 2002 Apr;11(4):659–674. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01468.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellwood D. R., Hughes T. P. Regional-scale assembly rules and biodiversity of coral reefs. Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1532–1535. doi: 10.1126/science.1058635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Civetta A., Singh R. S. High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J Mol Evol. 1995 Dec;41(6):1085–1095. doi: 10.1007/BF00173190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferris P. J., Pavlovic C., Fabry S., Goodenough U. W. Rapid evolution of sex-related genes in Chlamydomonas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8634–8639. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R., Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Geyer Laura B., Palumbi Stephen R. Reproductive character displacement and the genetics of gamete recognition in tropical sea urchins. Evolution. 2003 May;57(5):1049–1060. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gomendio M., Roldan E. R. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Mar 22;243(1308):181–185. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Koufopanou V., Reid D. G., Ridgway S. A., Thomas R. H. A molecular phylogeny of the patellid limpets (Gastropoda: Patellidae) and its implications for the origins of their antitropical distribution. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Feb;11(1):138–156. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar S., Tamura K., Jakobsen I. B., Nei M. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1244–1245. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LaMunyon Craig W., Ward Samuel. Evolution of larger sperm in response to experimentally increased sperm competition in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 7;269(1496):1125–1128. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lessios H. A., Kessing B. D., Pearse J. S. Population structure and speciation in tropical seas: global phylogeography of the sea urchin Diadema. Evolution. 2001 May;55(5):955–975. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0955:psasit]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levitan D. R., Irvine S. D. Fertilization selection on egg and jelly-coat size in the sand dollar Dendraster excentricus. Evolution. 2001 Dec;55(12):2479–2483. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mayfield J. A., Fiebig A., Johnstone S. E., Preuss D. Gene families from the Arabidopsis thaliana pollen coat proteome. Science. 2001 Jun 29;292(5526):2482–2485. doi: 10.1126/science.1060972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McCartney M. A., Keller G., Lessios H. A. Dispersal barriers in tropical oceans and speciation in Atlantic and eastern Pacific sea urchins of the genus Echinometra. Mol Ecol. 2000 Sep;9(9):1391–1400. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Metz E. C., Palumbi S. R. Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Feb;13(2):397–406. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mita Masatoshi, Uehara Tsuyoshi, Nakamura Masaru. Comparative studies on the energy metabolism in spermatozoa of four closely related species of sea urchins (genus Echinometra) in Okinawa. Zoolog Sci. 2002 Apr;19(4):419–427. doi: 10.2108/zsj.19.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Palumbi S. R., Cipriano F., Hare M. P. Predicting nuclear gene coalescence from mitochondrial data: the three-times rule. Evolution. 2001 May;55(5):859–868. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0859:pngcfm]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Palumbi S. R., Metz E. C. Strong reproductive isolation between closely related tropical sea urchins (genus Echinometra). Mol Biol Evol. 1991 Mar;8(2):227–239. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rahman M. A., Uehara T., Pearse J. S. Hybrids of two closely related tropical sea urchins (genus Echinometra): evidence against postzygotic isolating mechanisms. Biol Bull. 2001 Apr;200(2):97–106. doi: 10.2307/1543303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vacquier V. D., Moy G. W. Isolation of bindin: the protein responsible for adhesion of sperm to sea urchin eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2456–2460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wyckoff G. J., Wang W., Wu C. I. Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):304–309. doi: 10.1038/35002070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES