Abstract
Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in the process of speciation but few studies have elucidated the mechanisms either driving or constraining the evolution of reproductive isolation. In theory, the direct effects of reinforcing selection for increased mating discrimination where interbreeding produces hybrid offspring with low fitness and the indirect effects of adaptation to different environments can both promote speciation. Conversely, high levels of homogenizing gene flow can counteract the forces of selection. We demonstrate the opposing effects of reinforcing selection and gene flow in Timema cristinae walking-stick insects. The magnitude of female mating discrimination against males from other populations is greatest when migration rates between populations adapted to alternate host plants are high enough to allow the evolution of reinforcement, but low enough to prevent gene flow from eroding adaptive divergence in mate choice. Moreover, reproductive isolation is strongest under the combined effects of reinforcement and adaptation to alternate host plants. Our findings demonstrate the joint effects of reinforcement, ecological adaptation and gene flow on progress towards speciation in the wild.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beerli P., Felsenstein J. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 3;98(8):4563–4568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081068098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doebeli Michael, Dieckmann Ulf. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):259–264. doi: 10.1038/nature01274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funk Daniel J., Filchak Kenneth E., Feder Jeffrey L. Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica. 2002 Nov;116(2-3):251–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higgie M., Chenoweth S., Blows M. W. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):519–521. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5491.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiggins C. D., Naisbit R. E., Coe R. L., Mallet J. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature. 2001 May 17;411(6835):302–305. doi: 10.1038/35077075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly J. K., Noor M. A. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1485–1497. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noor M. A. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Nov;83(Pt 5):503–508. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noor M. A. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature. 1995 Jun 22;375(6533):674–675. doi: 10.1038/375674a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nosil Patrik, Crespi Bernard J., Sandoval Cristina P. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature. 2002 May 23;417(6887):440–443. doi: 10.1038/417440a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rolán-Alvarez E., Caballero A. Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies. Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):30–36. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rundle H. D., Nagel L., Wenrick Boughman J., Schluter D. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science. 2000 Jan 14;287(5451):306–308. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5451.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Servedio M. R. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution. 2001 Oct;55(10):1909–1920. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Servedio M. R. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):21–29. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]