Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Oct 7;270(1528):2079–2086. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2433

Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs.

Phillip G Byrne 1, Leigh W Simmons 1, J Dale Roberts 1
PMCID: PMC1691467  PMID: 14561298

Abstract

Despite detailed knowledge of the ultrastructure of spermatozoa, there is a paucity of information on the selective pressures that influence sperm form and function. Theoretical models for both internal and external fertilizers predict that sperm competition could favour the evolution of longer sperm. Empirical tests of the external-fertilization model have been restricted to just one group, the fishes, and these tests have proved equivocal. We investigated how sperm competition affects sperm morphology in externally fertilizing myobatrachid frogs. We also examined selection acting on egg size, and covariation between sperm and egg morphology. Species were ranked according to probability of group spawning and hence risk of sperm competition. Body size, testis size and oviposition environment may also influence gamete traits and were included in our analyses. After controlling for phylogenetic relationships between the species examined, we found that an increased risk of sperm competition was associated with increased sperm head and tail lengths. Path analysis showed that sperm competition had its greatest direct effect on sperm tail length, as might be expected under selection resulting from competitive fertilization. Sperm competition did not influence egg size. Oviposition location had a strong influence on egg size and a weak influence on sperm length, with terrestrial spawners having larger gametes than aquatic spawners. Our analysis revealed significant correlated evolution between egg morphology and sperm morphology. These data provide a conclusive demonstration that sperm competition selects for increased sperm length in frogs, and evidence for evolutionary covariance between aspects of male and female gamete morphology.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (195.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson Matthew J., Dixson Alan F. Sperm competition: motility and the midpiece in primates. Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):496–496. doi: 10.1038/416496a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ball M. A., Parker G. A. Sperm competition games: inter- and intra-species results of a continuous external fertilization model. J Theor Biol. 1997 Jun 21;186(4):459–466. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briskie J. V., Montgomerie R. Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Feb 22;247(1319):89–95. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cummins J. M., Woodall P. F. On mammalian sperm dimensions. J Reprod Fertil. 1985 Sep;75(1):153–175. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0750153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elinson R. P. Site of sperm entry and a cortical contraction associated with egg activation in the frog Rana pipiens. Dev Biol. 1975 Dec;47(2):257–268. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(75)90281-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gage M. J. Mammalian sperm morphometry. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jan 22;265(1391):97–103. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gage Matthew J. G., Freckleton Robert P. Relative testis size and sperm morphometry across mammals: no evidence for an association between sperm competition and sperm length. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):625–632. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gomendio M., Roldan E. R. Coevolution between male ejaculates and female reproductive biology in eutherian mammals. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Apr 22;252(1333):7–12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gomendio M., Roldan E. R. Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Mar 22;243(1308):181–185. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hosken D. J. Sperm competition in bats. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):385–392. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Levitan D. R., Irvine S. D. Fertilization selection on egg and jelly-coat size in the sand dollar Dendraster excentricus. Evolution. 2001 Dec;55(12):2479–2483. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00762.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller Gary T., Pitnick Scott. Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science. 2002 Nov 8;298(5596):1230–1233. doi: 10.1126/science.1076968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parker G. A. Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under adult control. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Sep 22;253(1338):245–254. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Podolsky R. D. Evolution of egg target size: an analysis of selection on correlated characters. Evolution. 2001 Dec;55(12):2470–2478. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Podolsky Robert D. Fertilization ecology of egg coats: physical versus chemical contributions to fertilization success of free-spawned eggs. J Exp Biol. 2002 Jun;205(Pt 11):1657–1668. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.11.1657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
14561298s01.pdf (134.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES