Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Oct 22;270(1529):2105–2110. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2438

Multiple density-dependence mechanisms regulate a migratory bird population during the breeding season.

Nicholas L Rodenhouse 1, T Scott Sillett 1, Patrick J Doran 1, Richard T Holmes 1
PMCID: PMC1691488  PMID: 14561272

Abstract

The mechanisms regulating bird populations are poorly understood and controversial. We provide evidence that a migratory songbird, the black-throated blue warbler (Dendroica caerulescens), is regulated by multiple density-dependence mechanisms in its breeding quarters. Evidence of regulation includes: stability in population density during 1969-2002, strong density dependence in time-series analyses of this period, an inverse relationship between warbler density and annual fecundity, and a positive relationship between annual fecundity and recruitment of yearlings in the subsequent breeding season. Tests of the mechanisms causing regulation were carried out within the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, during 1997-1999. When individuals from abutting territories were experimentally removed in a homogeneous patch of high-quality habitat, the fecundity of focal pairs nearly doubled, revealing a locally operating crowding mechanism. A site-dependence mechanism was indicated by an inverse relationship between population size and mean territory quality, as well as by greater annual fecundity on the sites that were most frequently occupied and of highest quality. These site-dependence relationships were revealed by intensive monitoring of territory quality and demography at the landscape spatial scale. Crowding and site-dependence mechanisms, therefore, acted simultaneously but at different spatial scales to regulate local abundance of this migratory bird population.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (199.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Krebs Charles J. Two complementary paradigms for analysing population dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1211–1219. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Marra PP, Hobson KA, Holmes RT. Linking winter and summer events in a migratory bird by using stable-carbon isotopes . Science. 1998 Dec 4;282(5395):1884–1886. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Robinson S. K., Thompson F. R., 3rd, Donovan T. M., Whitehead D. R., Faaborg J. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science. 1995 Mar 31;267(5206):1987–1990. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5206.1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Saether B., Tufto J., Engen S., Jerstad K., Rostad O. W., Skâtan J. E. Population dynamical consequences of climate change for a small temperate songbird. Science. 2000 Feb 4;287(5454):854–856. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sillett T. S., Holmes R. T., Sherry T. W. Impacts of a global climate cycle on population dynamics of a migratory songbird. Science. 2000 Jun 16;288(5473):2040–2042. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5473.2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sutherland William J., Norris Ken. Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1273–1284. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES