Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Oct 22;270(1529):2167–2172. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2502

Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance.

Nick Neave 1, Sarah Laing 1, Bernhard Fink 1, John T Manning 1
PMCID: PMC1691489  PMID: 14561281

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that male faces with extreme features associated with testosterone are perceived as dominant and masculine. Women have been reported to prefer more masculinized male faces as they may consider testosterone markers to be an 'honest' indication of good health, and such considerations may underlie their aesthetic preferences. However, pronounced testosterone facial markers are also associated with dominance, and several negative personality traits. This suggests that female aesthetic preferences may be an adaptive compromise between positive attributes associated with higher than average testosterone, and negative attributes associated with more extreme masculinization. This current study attempts to clarify the role of hormone markers in female perceptions of dominance, masculinity and attractiveness, in male facial images. Recent evidence suggests that the relative length of the 2nd to 4th finger (2D : 4D ratio) is a pointer to prenatal testosterone levels and may thus serve as a window to the prenatal hormonal environment. We measured 2D : 4D in a sample of male college students and took salivary samples to analyse circulating levels of testosterone. Women rated facial images of these males for dominance, masculinity and attractiveness. Our results show that male 2D : 4D was significantly negatively related to perceived dominance and masculinity but not attractiveness. Circulating testosterone levels were not related to dominance, masculinity or attractiveness. These findings suggest that: (i) high prenatal levels of testosterone serve to 'organize' male facial features to subsequently reflect dominance and masculine characteristics presumably activated during puberty; and (ii) attractiveness is not directly related to testosterone levels. We conclude that facial dominance and masculinity reflect a male's perceived status rather than his physical attraction to women.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (265.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer J. The influence of testosterone on human aggression. Br J Psychol. 1991 Feb;82(Pt 1):1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02379.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Booth A., Shelley G., Mazur A., Tharp G., Kittok R. Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition. Horm Behav. 1989 Dec;23(4):556–571. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(89)90042-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown Windy M., Hines Melissa, Fane Briony A., Breedlove S. Marc. Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Horm Behav. 2002 Dec;42(4):380–386. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cunningham M. R., Barbee A. P., Pike C. L. What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):61–72. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dabbs J. M., Jr Age and seasonal variation in serum testosterone concentration among men. Chronobiol Int. 1990;7(3):245–249. doi: 10.3109/07420529009056982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dabbs J. M., Jr, Jurkovic G. J., Frady R. L. Salivary testosterone and cortisol among late adolescent male offenders. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1991 Aug;19(4):469–478. doi: 10.1007/BF00919089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dewsbury D. A. Dominance rank, copulatory behavior, and differential reproduction. Q Rev Biol. 1982 Jun;57(2):135–159. doi: 10.1086/412672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grammer K., Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994 Sep;108(3):233–242. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grammer Karl, Fink Bernhard, Møller Anders P., Thornhill Randy. Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Aug;78(3):385–407. doi: 10.1017/s1464793102006085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Josephs Robert A., Newman Mathew L., Brown Ryan P., Beer Jeremy M. Status, testosterone, and human intellectual performance: stereotype threat as status concern. Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):158–163. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kasperk C., Helmboldt A., Börcsök I., Heuthe S., Cloos O., Niethard F., Ziegler R. Skeletal site-dependent expression of the androgen receptor in human osteoblastic cell populations. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997 Dec;61(6):464–473. doi: 10.1007/s002239900369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kraus C., Heistermann M., Kappeler P. M. Physiological suppression of sexual function of subordinate males: a subtle form of intrasexual competition among male sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi)? Physiol Behav. 1999 Jul;66(5):855–861. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00024-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Manning J. T., Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S., Sanders G. The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and autism. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Mar;43(3):160–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Manning J. T., Scutt D., Wilson J., Lewis-Jones D. I. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3000–3004. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Manning J. T., Taylor R. P. Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evol Hum Behav. 2001 Jan;22(1):61–69. doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00063-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Manning J. T., Trivers R. L., Singh D., Thornhill R. The mystery of female beauty. Nature. 1999 May 20;399(6733):214–216. doi: 10.1038/20341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Manning J. T., Trivers R. L., Thornhill R., Singh D. The 2nd:4th digit ratio and asymmetry of hand performance in Jamaican children. Laterality. 2000 Apr;5(2):121–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Maynard Smith J., Harper D. G. The evolution of aggression: can selection generate variability? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Jul 6;319(1196):557–570. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1988.0065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mazur A., Booth A. Testosterone and dominance in men. Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Jun;21(3):353–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morris J. S., Frith C. D., Perrett D. I., Rowland D., Young A. W., Calder A. J., Dolan R. J. A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions. Nature. 1996 Oct 31;383(6603):812–815. doi: 10.1038/383812a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mueller U. Social status and sex. Nature. 1993 Jun 10;363(6429):490–490. doi: 10.1038/363490a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Neave Nick, Wolfson Sandy. Testosterone, territoriality, and the 'home advantage'. Physiol Behav. 2003 Feb;78(2):269–275. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00969-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perrett D. I., Lee K. J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D. M., Henzi S. P., Castles D. L., Akamatsu S. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998 Aug 27;394(6696):884–887. doi: 10.1038/29772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ronalds G., Phillips D. I. W., Godfrey K. M., Manning J. T. The ratio of second to fourth digit lengths: a marker of impaired fetal growth? Early Hum Dev. 2002 Jun;68(1):21–26. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(02)00009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Salvadora A., Suay F., Martinez-Sanchis S., Simon V. M., Brain P. F. Correlating testosterone and fighting in male participants in judo contests. Physiol Behav. 1999 Dec 1;68(1-2):205–209. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00168-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schaal B., Tremblay R. E., Soussignan R., Susman E. J. Male testosterone linked to high social dominance but low physical aggression in early adolescence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;35(10):1322–1330. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199610000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Scheib J. E., Gangestad S. W., Thornhill R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Sep 22;266(1431):1913–1917. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Swaddle John P., Reierson Gillian W. Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 22;269(1507):2285–2289. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):452–460. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vittek J., L'Hommedieu D. G., Gordon G. G., Rappaport S. C., Southren A. L. Direct radioimmunoassay (RIA) of salivary testosterone: correlation with free and total serum testosterone. Life Sci. 1985 Aug 26;37(8):711–716. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(85)90540-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES