Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Nov 7;270(1530):2233–2240. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2508

Trans-shell infection by pathogenic micro-organisms reduces the shelf life of non-incubated bird's eggs: a constraint on the onset of incubation?

Mark I Cook 1, Steven R Beissinger 1, Gary A Toranzos 1, Roberto A Rodriguez 1, Wayne J Arendt 1
PMCID: PMC1691504  PMID: 14613609

Abstract

Many birds initiate incubation before clutch completion, which results in asynchronous hatching. The ensuing within-brood size disparity often places later-hatched nestlings at a developmental disadvantage, but the functional significance of the timing of the onset of incubation is poorly understood. Early incubation may serve to maintain the viability of early-laid eggs, which declines over time owing to the putative effects of ambient temperature. An unexplored risk to egg viability is trans-shell infection by micro-organisms. We experimentally investigated the rate and magnitude of microbial trans-shell infection of the egg, and the relative effects of ambient temperature and micro-organisms on hatching success. We show that infection of egg contents is prevalent and occurs within the time required to lay a clutch. The probability of infection depends on the climatic conditions, the exposure period and the phylogenetic composition of the eggshell microbiota. We also demonstrate that microbial infection and ambient temperature act independently to reduce egg viability considerably. Our results suggest that these two factors could affect the onset of avian incubation in a wide range of environments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (188.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Board P. A., Board R. G. A method of studying bacterial penetration of the shell of the hen's egg. Lab Pract. 1967 Apr;16(4):471–passim. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Board R. G., Fuller R. Non-specific antimicrobial defences of the avian egg, embryo and neonate. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1974 Feb;49(1):15–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1974.tb01297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Board R. G. Review article: the course of microbial infection of the hen's egg. J Appl Bacteriol. 1966 Aug;29(2):319–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1966.tb03482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Houston C. S., Saunders J. R., Crawford R. D. Aerobic bacterial flora of addled raptor eggs in Saskatchewan. J Wildl Dis. 1997 Apr;33(2):328–331. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-33.2.328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reneerkens Jeroen, Piersma Theunis, Sinninghe Damsté Jaap S. Sandpipers (Scolopacidae) switch from monoester to diester preen waxes during courtship and incubation, but why? Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 22;269(1505):2135–2139. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES