Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2389–2395. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2530

Multiple male traits interact: attractive bower decorations facilitate attractive behavioural displays in satin bowerbirds.

Gail L Patricelli 1, J Albert C Uy 1, Gerald Borgia 1
PMCID: PMC1691511  PMID: 14667356

Abstract

Sexually selected male courtship displays often involve multiple behavioural and physical traits, but little is known about the function of different traits in mate choice. Here, we examine female courtship behaviours to learn how male traits interact to influence female mating decisions. In satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus), successful males give highly aggressive, intense behavioural displays without startling females. Males do this by modulating their displays in response to female crouching, which signals the display intensity that females will tolerate without being startled. Females typically visit multiple males for multiple courtships before choosing a mate, and females show differing tolerance for intense displays during their first courtship with each male. We test three hypotheses that may explain this: (i) familiarity with the courting male; (ii) the order of the courtship in mate-searching; and (iii) the attractiveness of the courting male. We found that females are more tolerant of intense displays during first courtships with attractive males; this increased female tolerance may allow attractive males to give higher intensity courtship displays that further enhance their attractiveness. We then examined why this is so, finding evidence that females are less likely to be startled by males with better physical displays (bower decorations), and this reduced startling then contributes to male courtship success. This role of physical displays in facilitating behavioural displays suggests a novel mechanism by which multiple physical and behavioural traits may influence female choice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (169.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Borgia G, Presgraves DC. Coevolution of elaborated male display traits in the spotted bowerbird: an experimental test of the threat reduction hypothesis. Anim Behav. 1998 Nov;56(5):1121–1128. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hasson O. Amplifiers and the handicap principle in sexual selection: a different emphasis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 Jan 23;235(1281):383–406. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1989.0006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Koch M. The neurobiology of startle. Prog Neurobiol. 1999 Oct;59(2):107–128. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00098-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lang P. J. The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. Am Psychol. 1995 May;50(5):372–385. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.50.5.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Patricelli Gail L., Uy J. Albert C., Walsh Gregory, Borgia Gerald. Male displays adjusted to female's response. Nature. 2002 Jan 17;415(6869):279–280. doi: 10.1038/415279a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rowe C. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):921–931. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Uy J. A., Patricelli G. L., Borgia G. Dynamic mate-searching tactic allows female satin bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus to reduce searching. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 7;267(1440):251–256. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES