Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2377–2381. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2514

Costly traumatic insemination and a female counter-adaptation in bed bugs.

Edward H Morrow 1, Göran Arnqvist 1
PMCID: PMC1691516  PMID: 14667354

Abstract

Male bed bugs pierce females through the body wall and inseminate directly into the body cavity. It has previously been shown that such traumatic insemination carries costs for females, and sexual conflict regarding the mode of insemination should thus propel male-female coevolution. Since males accumulate sexually antagonistic adaptations, females should evolve counter-adaptations that efficiently abate the costs to females of sexual interactions. Yet, unambiguous experimental evidence for female counter-adaptations is lacking. In bed bugs, the spermalege (a highly modified region of the abdomen where the male usually pierces the female) may represent a female counter-adaptation. We assess the female costs of traumatic insemination by varying the rate of insemination on the one hand, and the rate and mode of piercing trauma to females on the other. Our results show that female mating costs are not extreme-elevated mating rate shortened female lifespan but had no significant effect on lifetime egg production. More importantly, additional abdominal piercing in the spermalege had no effect on females whereas even a very low rate of such piercing outside the spermalege reduced female lifetime egg production by 50%. Thus, females are well counter-adapted to the intrusive mode of insemination exhibited by male bed bugs and the costs of elevated mating are comparable with those in other insects, as predicted by theory. We therefore demonstrate that the spermalege efficiently reduces the direct costs of piercing trauma to females, and hence provide experimental evidence for a female counter-adaptation to a sexually antagonistic male trait.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (129.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):145–164. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnqvist Göran, Rowe Locke. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):787–789. doi: 10.1038/415787a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnqvist Göran, Rowe Locke. Correlated evolution of male and female morphologles in water striders. Evolution. 2002 May;56(5):936–947. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01406.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapman T., Partridge L. Sexual conflict as fuel for evolution. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):189–190. doi: 10.1038/381189a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chapman T. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 2001 Nov;87(Pt 5):511–521. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dawkins R., Krebs J. R. Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):489–511. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gavrilets S. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):886–889. doi: 10.1038/35002564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holland B., Rice W. R. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):5083–5088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.9.5083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hosken D. J., Martin O. Y., Born J., Huber F. Sexual conflict in Sepsis cynipsea: female reluctance, fertility and mate choice. J Evol Biol. 2003 May;16(3):485–490. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Parker G. A., Partridge L. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):261–274. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rice W. R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):232–234. doi: 10.1038/381232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stutt A. D., Siva-Jothy M. T. Traumatic insemination and sexual conflict in the bed bug Cimex lectularius. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 1;98(10):5683–5687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101440698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES