Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2475–2480. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2511

Adaptive innate immunity? Responsive-mode prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor.

Yannick Moret 1, Michael T Siva-Jothy 1
PMCID: PMC1691523  PMID: 14667338

Abstract

A primary infection by a parasite may indicate a higher risk of being reinfected in the near future (since infection may indicate that enemies are becoming more abundant). Acquired immunity does not exist in invertebrates despite the fact that they also face increased risks of reinfection following primary exposure. However, when subjected to immune insult, insects can produce immune responses that persist for long enough to provide prophylaxis. Because these immune responses are costly, persistence must be maintained through a selective advantage. We tested for the possibility that these long-lasting immune responses provided increased resistance to later infections by experimentally mimicking a primary immune insult (pre-challenge) in larvae of the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor, with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) prior to early or late exposure to spores of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. We found that pre-challenged larvae produced a long-lasting antimicrobial response, which provided a survival benefit when the larvae were exposed to fungal infection. These results suggest that the observed response is functionally "adaptive".

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnes A. I., Siva-Jothy M. T. Density-dependent prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): cuticular melanization is an indicator of investment in immunity. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 22;267(1439):177–182. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gillespie J. P., Kanost M. R., Trenczek T. Biological mediators of insect immunity. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:611–643. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gottar Marie, Gobert Vanessa, Michel Tatiana, Belvin Marcia, Duyk Geoffrey, Hoffmann Jules A., Ferrandon Dominique, Royet Julien. The Drosophila immune response against Gram-negative bacteria is mediated by a peptidoglycan recognition protein. Nature. 2002 Mar 24;416(6881):640–644. doi: 10.1038/nature734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hoffmann J. A., Reichhart J. M., Hetru C. Innate immunity in higher insects. Curr Opin Immunol. 1996 Feb;8(1):8–13. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(96)80098-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huang C. C., Song Y. L. Maternal transmission of immunity to white spot syndrome associated virus (WSSV) in shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Dev Comp Immunol. 1999 Oct-Dec;23(7-8):545–552. doi: 10.1016/s0145-305x(99)00038-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hughes A. L. Protein phylogenies provide evidence of a radical discontinuity between arthropod and vertebrate immune systems. Immunogenetics. 1998 Mar;47(4):283–296. doi: 10.1007/s002510050360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jomori T., Kubo T., Natori S. Purification and characterization of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein from hemolymph of American cockroach Periplaneta americana. Eur J Biochem. 1990 May 31;190(1):201–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb15565.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lemaitre B., Nicolas E., Michaut L., Reichhart J. M., Hoffmann J. A. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spätzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell. 1996 Sep 20;86(6):973–983. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80172-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Little Tom J., O'Connor Benjamin, Colegrave Nick, Watt Kathryn, Read Andrew F. Maternal transfer of strain-specific immunity in an invertebrate. Curr Biol. 2003 Mar 18;13(6):489–492. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00163-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Medzhitov R., Janeway C. A., Jr An ancient system of host defense. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998 Feb;10(1):12–15. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moret Y., Schmid-Hempel P. Immune defence in bumble-bee offspring. Nature. 2001 Nov 29;414(6863):506–506. doi: 10.1038/35107138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moret Y., Schmid-Hempel P. Survival for immunity: the price of immune system activation for bumblebee workers. Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1166–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rinkevich B. Invertebrates versus vertebrates innate immunity: In the light of evolution. Scand J Immunol. 1999 Nov;50(5):456–460. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00626.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sugumaran M., Nellaiappan K., Valivittan K. A new mechanism for the control of phenoloxidase activity: inhibition and complex formation with quinone isomerase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000 Jul 15;379(2):252–260. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2000.1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Söderhäll K., Cerenius L. Role of the prophenoloxidase-activating system in invertebrate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998 Feb;10(1):23–28. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Söderhäll K. Prophenoloxidase activating system and melanization - a recognition mechanism of arthropods? A review. Dev Comp Immunol. 1982 Fall;6(4):601–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tzou Phoebe, De Gregorio Ennio, Lemaitre Bruno. How Drosophila combats microbial infection: a model to study innate immunity and host-pathogen interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002 Feb;5(1):102–110. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00294-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES