Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jan 22;271(1535):139–146. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2566

The effects of task and saliency on latencies for colour and motion processing.

Wendy J Adams 1, Pascal Mamassian 1
PMCID: PMC1691568  PMID: 15058389

Abstract

In human visual perception, there is evidence that different visual attributes, such as colour, form and motion, have different neural-processing latencies. Specifically, recent studies have suggested that colour changes are processed faster than motion changes. We propose that the processing latencies should not be considered as fixed quantities for different attributes, but instead depend upon attribute salience and the observer's task. We asked observers to respond to high- and low-salience colour and motion changes in three different tasks. The tasks varied from having a strong motor component to having a strong perceptual component. Increasing salience led to shorter processing times in all three tasks. We also found an interaction between task and attribute: motion was processed more quickly in reaction-time tasks, whereas colour was processed more quickly in more perceptual tasks. Our results caution against making direct comparisons between latencies for processing different visual attributes without equating salience or considering task effects. More-salient attributes are processed faster than less-salient ones, and attributes that are critical for the task are also processed more quickly.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (197.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ansorge U., Klotz W., Neumann O. Manual and verbal responses to completely masked (unreportable) stimuli: exploring some conditions for the metacontrast dissociation. Perception. 1998;27(10):1177–1189. doi: 10.1068/p271177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold D. H., Clifford C. W., Wenderoth P. Asynchronous processing in vision: color leads motion. Curr Biol. 2001 Apr 17;11(8):596–600. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbur J. L., Wolf J., Lennie P. Visual processing levels revealed by response latencies to changes in different visual attributes. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Dec 7;265(1412):2321–2325. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowen R. W. Latencies for chromatic and achromatic visual mechanisms. Vision Res. 1981;21(10):1457–1466. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(81)90216-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dzhafarov E. N., Sekuler R., Allik J. Detection of changes in speed and direction of motion: reaction time analysis. Percept Psychophys. 1993 Dec;54(6):733–750. doi: 10.3758/bf03211798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gegenfurtner K. R., Hawken M. J. Interaction of motion and color in the visual pathways. Trends Neurosci. 1996 Sep;19(9):394–401. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(96)10036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hohnsbein J., Mateeff S. The time it takes to detect changes in speed and direction of visual motion. Vision Res. 1998 Sep;38(17):2569–2573. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Livingstone M., Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):740–749. doi: 10.1126/science.3283936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mateeff S., Dimitrov G., Hohnsbein J. Temporal thresholds and reaction time to changes in velocity of visual motion. Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):355–363. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00130-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Merigan W. H., Maunsell J. H. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annu Rev Neurosci. 1993;16:369–402. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller Jeff, Ulrich Rolf. Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: a parallel grains model. Cogn Psychol. 2003 Mar;46(2):101–151. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00517-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moutoussis K., Zeki S. A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):393–399. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nishida Shin'ya, Johnston Alan. Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Curr Biol. 2002 Mar 5;12(5):359–368. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00698-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. RAAB D. H. Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Trans N Y Acad Sci. 1962 Mar;24:574–590. doi: 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ramachandran V. S., Gregory R. L. Does colour provide an input to human motion perception? Nature. 1978 Sep 7;275(5675):55–56. doi: 10.1038/275055a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roufs J. A. Dynamic properties of vision. V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds. Vision Res. 1974 Sep;14(9):853–869. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(74)90149-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schiller P. H., Logothetis N. K. The color-opponent and broad-band channels of the primate visual system. Trends Neurosci. 1990 Oct;13(10):392–398. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90117-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tappe T., Niepel M., Neumann O. A dissociation between reaction time to sinusoidal gratings and temporal-order judgment. Perception. 1994;23(3):335–347. doi: 10.1068/p230335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Walsh Vincent. Vision: the when of perception. Curr Biol. 2002 May 14;12(10):R355–R356. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00858-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wichmann F. A., Hill N. J. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314–1329. doi: 10.3758/bf03194545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams J. M., Lit A. Luminance-dependent visual latency for the Hess effect, the Pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time. Vision Res. 1983;23(2):171–179. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90140-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zeki S. M. Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature. 1978 Aug 3;274(5670):423–428. doi: 10.1038/274423a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zeki S., Bartels A. The autonomy of the visual systems and the modularity of conscious vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Nov 29;353(1377):1911–1914. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES