Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Feb 7;271(1536):279–283. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2571

Does predation maintain eyespot plasticity in Bicyclus anynana?

Anne Lyytinen 1, Paul M Brakefield 1, Leena Lindström 1, Johanna Mappes 1
PMCID: PMC1691594  PMID: 15058439

Abstract

The butterfly Bicyclus anynana exhibits phenotypic plasticity involving the wet-season phenotype, which possesses marginal eyespots on the ventral surface of the wings, and the dry-season form, which lacks these eyespots. We examined the adaptive value of phenotypic plasticity of B. anynana in relation to the defence mechanisms of crypsis and deflection. We assessed the visibility differences between spotless and spotted butterflies against backgrounds of brown (dry season) or green (wet season) leaves. Spotless butterflies were highly cryptic and less predated by adult bird predators than were spotted ones when presented against brown leaf litter. However, the advantage of crypsis disappeared in the wet-season habitat as both forms were equally visible. In later experiments, naive birds presented with resting butterflies in the wet-season habitat tended to learn more rapidly to capture spotless butterflies, suggesting a slight selective advantage of possessing eyespots. Moreover, marginal eyespots increased significantly the escape probability of butterflies that were attacked by naive birds compared to those attacked by adult birds, although there were no differences in prey capture success within naive predators. Our results show that natural selection acts against eyespots in the dry season, favouring crypsis, whereas in the wet season it may favour eyespots as deflective patterns.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (142.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brakefield P. M., Gates J., Keys D., Kesbeke F., Wijngaarden P. J., Monteiro A., French V., Carroll S. B. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature. 1996 Nov 21;384(6606):236–242. doi: 10.1038/384236a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breuker Casper J., Brakefield Paul M. Female choice depends on size but not symmetry of dorsal eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 22;269(1497):1233–1239. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kooi R. E., Brakefield P. M. The critical period for wing pattern induction in the polyphenic tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyrinae). J Insect Physiol. 1999 Mar;45(3):201–212. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(98)00093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES