Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Feb 22;271(1537):397–405. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2592

Weak interactions, omnivory and emergent food-web properties.

Mark Emmerson 1, Jon M Yearsley 1
PMCID: PMC1691599  PMID: 15101699

Abstract

Empirical studies have shown that, in real ecosystems, species-interaction strengths are generally skewed in their distribution towards weak interactions. Some theoretical work also suggests that weak interactions, especially in omnivorous links, are important for the local stability of a community at equilibrium. However, the majority of theoretical studies use uniform distributions of interaction strengths to generate artificial communities for study. We investigate the effects of the underlying interaction-strength distribution upon the return time, permanence and feasibility of simple Lotka-Volterra equilibrium communities. We show that a skew towards weak interactions promotes local and global stability only when omnivory is present. It is found that skewed interaction strengths are an emergent property of stable omnivorous communities, and that this skew towards weak interactions creates a dynamic constraint maintaining omnivory. Omnivory is more likely to occur when omnivorous interactions are skewed towards weak interactions. However, a skew towards weak interactions increases the return time to equilibrium, delays the recovery of ecosystems and hence decreases the stability of a community. When no skew is imposed, the set of stable omnivorous communities shows an emergent distribution of skewed interaction strengths. Our results apply to both local and global concepts of stability and are robust to the definition of a feasible community. These results are discussed in the light of empirical data and other theoretical studies, in conjunction with their broader implications for community assembly.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (162.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Drossel B., Higgs P. G., McKane A. J. The influence of predator--prey population dynamics on the long-term evolution of food web structure. J Theor Biol. 2001 Jan 7;208(1):91–107. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jonsson T, Ebenman B. Effects of Predator-prey Body Size Ratios on the Stability of Food Chains. J Theor Biol. 1998 Aug 7;193(3):407–417. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Neutel Anje-Margriet, Heesterbeek Johan A. P., De Ruiter Peter C. Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loops. Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1120–1123. doi: 10.1126/science.1068326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Polis GA, Sears AL, Huxel GR, Strong DR, Maron J. When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Nov 1;15(11):473–475. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01971-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sanford E. Regulation of keystone predation by small changes in ocean temperature . Science. 1999 Mar 26;283(5410):2095–2097. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5410.2095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sourifman H. A., Thomas M. P., Epstein D. L. Hyperbaric oxygenation and ulcer treatment: a case report. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1981 Jul;71(7):381–385. doi: 10.7547/87507315-71-7-381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stellwagen E., Wilgus H. Relationship of protein thermostability to accessible surface area. Nature. 1978 Sep 28;275(5678):342–343. doi: 10.1038/275342a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. de Ruiter P. C., Neutel A. M., Moore J. C. Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science. 1995 Sep 1;269(5228):1257–1260. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5228.1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15101699s01.pdf (439KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES