Abstract
Müllerian mimicry, where unpalatable prey share common warning patterns, has long fascinated evolutionary biologists. It is commonly assumed that Müllerian mimics benefit by sharing the costs of predator education, thus reducing per capita mortality, although there has been no direct test of this assumption. Here, we specifically measure the selection pressure exerted by avian predators on unpalatable prey with different degrees of visual similarity in their warning patterns. Using wild-caught birds foraging on novel patterned prey in the laboratory, we unexpectedly found that pattern similarity did not increase the speed of avoidance learning, and even dissimilar mimics shared the education of naive predators. This was a consistent finding across two different densities of unpalatable prey, although mortalities were lower at the higher density as expected. Interestingly, the mortalities of Müllerian mimics were affected by pattern similarity in the predicted way by the end of our experiment, although the result was not quite significant. This suggests that the benefits to Müllerian mimics may emerge only later in the learning process, and that predator experience of the patterns may affect the degree to which pattern similarity is important. This highlights the need to measure the behaviour of real predators if we are to understand fully the evolution of mimicry systems.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (130.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dumbacher J. P., Fleischer R. C. Phylogenetic evidence for colour pattern convergence in toxic pitohuis: Müllerian mimicry in birds? Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 7;268(1480):1971–1976. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gamberale-Stille G., Tullberg B. S. Fruit or aposematic insect? Context-dependent colour preferences in domestic chicks. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 22;268(1485):2525–2529. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kapan D. D. Three-butterfly system provides a field test of müllerian mimicry. Nature. 2001 Jan 18;409(6818):338–340. doi: 10.1038/35053066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindström L., Alatalo R. V., Lyytinen A., Mappes J. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(16):9181–9184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161071598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M A, Stamp dawkins M Predator discrimination error and the benefits of Müllerian mimicry. Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1281–1288. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osorio D., Jones C. D., Vorobyev M. Accurate memory for colour but not pattern contrast in chicks. Curr Biol. 1999 Feb 25;9(4):199–202. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80089-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riipi M., Alatalo R. V., Lindström L., Mappes J. Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations. Nature. 2001 Oct 4;413(6855):512–514. doi: 10.1038/35097061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Speed M. P., Alderson N. J., Hardman C., Ruxton G. D. Testing Müllerian mimicry: an experiment with wild birds. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 7;267(1444):725–731. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Symula R., Schulte R., Summers K. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a mimetic radiation in Peruvian poison frogs supports a Müllerian mimicry hypothesis. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 7;268(1484):2415–2421. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]